From c22afa7d97b8fe2fc00aa5da73ed1d2d8669cd1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 08:36:29 +0000 Subject: I agree with vl's #if 0 here, and am not quite sure what I was thinking with regard to the original code. Let's keep samba simple, and just remove it. Andrew Bartlett (This used to be commit 156cf8bede52e1d33be980fd8841367253a60b9e) --- source3/passdb/pdb_get_set.c | 13 ------------- 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) (limited to 'source3/passdb') diff --git a/source3/passdb/pdb_get_set.c b/source3/passdb/pdb_get_set.c index 46c49be8b1..4a5a5759d4 100644 --- a/source3/passdb/pdb_get_set.c +++ b/source3/passdb/pdb_get_set.c @@ -1045,19 +1045,6 @@ BOOL pdb_set_backend_private_data (SAM_ACCOUNT *sampass, void *private_data, if (!sampass) return False; -#if 0 - /* With this check backend_private_data_free_fn is *never* set - as the methods are never set anywhere. What is this - supposed to do ???? - - Volker - */ - - /* does this backend 'own' this SAM_ACCOUNT? */ - if (my_methods != sampass->private.backend_private_methods) - return False; -#endif - if (sampass->private.backend_private_data && sampass->private.backend_private_data_free_fn) { sampass->private.backend_private_data_free_fn(&sampass->private.backend_private_data); } -- cgit