From c1334b143bb52fbdc31c1aa26d06249ca1f74752 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Potter Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 01:31:51 +0000 Subject: OK that last commit was incorrect - this call is parsed properly. I only imagined it wasn't! (This used to be commit bbad6c6678c89a33fb233091f5965ccd1aa589f6) --- source3/rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'source3/rpc_parse') diff --git a/source3/rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c b/source3/rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c index 3e3ddb9a01..bcfaa1d42f 100644 --- a/source3/rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c +++ b/source3/rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c @@ -4261,10 +4261,6 @@ BOOL spoolss_io_q_enumprinterdrivers(char *desc, SPOOL_Q_ENUMPRINTERDRIVERS *q_u if (!prs_uint32("offered", ps, depth, &q_u->offered)) return False; - /* According to MSDN there is another [in] parameter for this rpc - which could be a pointer to a buffer. NT4 puts four zero bytes - here which we currently don't parse. -tpot */ - return True; } -- cgit