From 140752fd35bd5701b3078abf695f811d933fe893 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Volker Lendecke Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:52:44 +0000 Subject: r5647: Caches are good for performance, but you get a consistency problem. Fix bug # 2401. Volker (This used to be commit eb4ef94f244d28fe531d0b9f724a66ed3834b687) --- source3/rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) (limited to 'source3/rpc_server') diff --git a/source3/rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c b/source3/rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c index 8a10fa6d2d..139960f661 100644 --- a/source3/rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c +++ b/source3/rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c @@ -2335,6 +2335,7 @@ NTSTATUS _samr_create_user(pipes_struct *p, SAMR_Q_CREATE_USER *q_u, SAMR_R_CREA /* implicit call to getpwnam() next. we have a valid SID coming out of this call */ + flush_pwnam_cache(); nt_status = pdb_init_sam_new(&sam_pass, account, new_rid); /* this code is order such that we have no unnecessary retuns @@ -3805,6 +3806,7 @@ static int smb_delete_user(const char *unix_user) return -1; all_string_sub(del_script, "%u", unix_user, sizeof(del_script)); ret = smbrun(del_script,NULL); + flush_pwnam_cache(); DEBUG(ret ? 0 : 3,("smb_delete_user: Running the command `%s' gave %d\n",del_script,ret)); return ret; -- cgit