From 89c56492a86fb02b2045182490b93f17a475f03d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luke Leighton Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 21:48:06 +0000 Subject: - oops, i got "add alias member" and "delete alias member" swapped. - samr_enum_dom_users, the first 4 bytes is some sort of garbage, nt5-beta2 clears them out to zeros whereas nt4 does not. fixed bug where we were assuming that the first 4 bytes of a response _had_ to be non-zero. - cli_lsarpc.c: forgot to append the rid on the lsa_lookup_names() client call. - added in "addaliasmem" and "addgroupmem" commands. the addaliasmem command actually turned out to be a "delaliasmem" :-) :-) - parse_lsa.c: moved assert array check to after the size of useable array space is set... (This used to be commit 165b15a8cacc4bc7cf8cc0b9aaabb6b92cef7fdb) --- source3/rpc_server/srv_samr.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'source3/rpc_server') diff --git a/source3/rpc_server/srv_samr.c b/source3/rpc_server/srv_samr.c index 9ed2409ab2..02bfa2e178 100644 --- a/source3/rpc_server/srv_samr.c +++ b/source3/rpc_server/srv_samr.c @@ -350,7 +350,6 @@ static void samr_reply_enum_dom_users(SAMR_Q_ENUM_DOM_USERS *q_u, int total_entries; r_e.status = 0x0; - r_e.total_num_entries = 0; /* find the policy handle. open a policy on it. */ if (r_e.status == 0x0 && (find_lsa_policy_by_hnd(&(q_u->pol)) == -1)) @@ -364,8 +363,8 @@ static void samr_reply_enum_dom_users(SAMR_Q_ENUM_DOM_USERS *q_u, get_sampwd_entries(pass, 0, &total_entries, &num_entries, MAX_SAM_ENTRIES, q_u->acb_mask); unbecome_root(True); - make_samr_r_enum_dom_users(&r_e, total_entries, - q_u->unknown_0, num_entries, + make_samr_r_enum_dom_users(&r_e, + 0x00000000, num_entries, pass, r_e.status); /* store the response in the SMB stream */ -- cgit