From 2c6030415e0b1f421ea6e85fe6ffe7389ee7a941 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeremy Allison Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:14:24 +0000 Subject: r17314: Optimisation for POSIX locking. If we're downgrading a POSIX lock (applying a read-lock) and we overlap pending read locks then send them an unlock message, we may have allowed them to proceed. Jeremy. (This used to be commit a7a0b6ba50f4cf7c5a0a29809fdff9e1266a29e7) --- source3/smbd/blocking.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'source3/smbd/blocking.c') diff --git a/source3/smbd/blocking.c b/source3/smbd/blocking.c index ed57c9f621..0304a6559f 100644 --- a/source3/smbd/blocking.c +++ b/source3/smbd/blocking.c @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ BOOL push_blocking_lock_request( struct byte_range_lock *br_lck, procid_self(), offset, count, - PENDING_LOCK, + lock_type == READ_LOCK ? PENDING_READ_LOCK : PENDING_WRITE_LOCK, blr->lock_flav, lock_timeout ? True : False); /* blocking_lock. */ -- cgit