From 79842437684be380407661fc27e64f223a326b18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeremy Allison Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:40:28 -0700 Subject: Move to using 64-bit mid values in our internal open file database. This will allow us to share logic much easier between SMB1 and SMB2 servers. Jeremy --- source3/smbd/blocking.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'source3/smbd/blocking.c') diff --git a/source3/smbd/blocking.c b/source3/smbd/blocking.c index 90d2f31345..d876c8b438 100644 --- a/source3/smbd/blocking.c +++ b/source3/smbd/blocking.c @@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ void cancel_pending_lock_requests_by_fid(files_struct *fsp, struct byte_range_lo Delete entries by mid from the blocking lock pending queue. Always send reply. *****************************************************************************/ -void remove_pending_lock_requests_by_mid(int mid) +void remove_pending_lock_requests_by_mid(uint64_t mid) { struct blocking_lock_record *blr, *next = NULL; @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ void remove_pending_lock_requests_by_mid(int mid) Is this mid a blocking lock request on the queue ? *****************************************************************************/ -bool blocking_lock_was_deferred(int mid) +bool blocking_lock_was_deferred(uint64_t mid) { struct blocking_lock_record *blr, *next = NULL; -- cgit