From cfb7c04696f0ac4306a6e1847212fed44f6b2cd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:17:23 +0000
Subject: r23910: We used to deny renames on the source open for non-delete
 open. Turns out this is not the case. VL please test but this matches Windows
 behaviour. (I'll add a torture test tomorrow). Jeremy. (This used to be
 commit 03e3d587468ce66044814a8a58308b2fe9ab5499)

---
 source3/smbd/reply.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

(limited to 'source3/smbd')

diff --git a/source3/smbd/reply.c b/source3/smbd/reply.c
index e3ae0ef7f6..2135299df0 100644
--- a/source3/smbd/reply.c
+++ b/source3/smbd/reply.c
@@ -1863,6 +1863,12 @@ static NTSTATUS can_rename(connection_struct *conn, files_struct *fsp,
 		return NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_FILE;
 	}
 
+#if 0
+	/* We used to deny renames on the
+	 * source open for non-delete open.
+	 * Turns out this is not the case.
+	 * VL please test but this matches
+	 * Windows behaviour. JRA. */
 	if (S_ISDIR(pst->st_mode)) {
 		return NT_STATUS_OK;
 	}
@@ -1872,6 +1878,9 @@ static NTSTATUS can_rename(connection_struct *conn, files_struct *fsp,
 	}
 
 	return NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED;
+#else
+	return NT_STATUS_OK;
+#endif
 }
 
 /*******************************************************************
-- 
cgit