From 8f5d55eb365117b27333a77956e32ca7dac9cfab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Christopher R. Hertel" Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 23:17:30 +0000 Subject: The line was: struct tdb_traverse_lock tl = { tdb->travlocks.next, 0, 0 }; The IRIX compiler complained that the first initialization value was not a constant and errored out. Here's what it looks like now: struct tdb_traverse_lock tl = { NULL, 0, 0 }; int ret, count = 0; /* This was in the initializaton, above, but the IRIX compiler * did not like it. crh */ tl.next = tdb->travlocks.next; That worked. Chris -)----- (This used to be commit e651d1d642cd1bfac11bec81a30915b95d4424c8) --- source3/tdb/tdb.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'source3/tdb') diff --git a/source3/tdb/tdb.c b/source3/tdb/tdb.c index afc87b7da0..474d0c7adb 100644 --- a/source3/tdb/tdb.c +++ b/source3/tdb/tdb.c @@ -850,9 +850,14 @@ int tdb_traverse(TDB_CONTEXT *tdb, tdb_traverse_func fn, void *state) { TDB_DATA key, dbuf; struct list_struct rec; - struct tdb_traverse_lock tl = { tdb->travlocks.next, 0, 0 }; + struct tdb_traverse_lock tl = { NULL, 0, 0 }; int ret, count = 0; + /* This was in the initializaton, above, but the IRIX compiler + * did not like it. crh + */ + tl.next = tdb->travlocks.next; + /* fcntl locks don't stack: beware traverse inside traverse */ tdb->travlocks.next = &tl; -- cgit