From ce17aace9944541f430645c373025ad98dded75d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Christopher R. Hertel" Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 17:42:20 +0000 Subject: Again, just syncronizing. The a function name was changed in the sll module but none of Samba uses it directly. The macros are used instead so the change is hidden. Good. (This used to be commit c5d7ee506da31bbfbd6775c2dbcd121a44de794d) --- source3/ubiqx/ubi_dLinkList.h | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'source3/ubiqx/ubi_dLinkList.h') diff --git a/source3/ubiqx/ubi_dLinkList.h b/source3/ubiqx/ubi_dLinkList.h index 548f8e5200..682e566ee6 100644 --- a/source3/ubiqx/ubi_dLinkList.h +++ b/source3/ubiqx/ubi_dLinkList.h @@ -26,7 +26,13 @@ * * -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** * - * Log: ubi_dLinkList.h,v + * Log: ubi_dLinkList.h,v + * Revision 0.11 1999/06/19 16:58:06 crh + * Renamed the ubi_slRemove() function in ubi_sLinkList to + * ubi_slRemoveNext(). I was bothered by the fact that it didn't + * match the functionality of the ubi_dlRemove() function in + * ubi_dLinkList. The new name is more 'correct'. + * * Revision 0.10 1998/07/24 07:30:20 crh * Added the ubi_dlNewList() macro. * @@ -66,7 +72,7 @@ * This module is similar to the ubi_sLinkList module, but it is neither a * descendant type nor an easy drop-in replacement for the latter. One key * difference is that the ubi_dlRemove() function removes the indicated node, - * while the ubi_slRemove() function (in ubi_sLinkList) removes the node + * while the ubi_slRemoveNext() function (in ubi_sLinkList) removes the node * *following* the indicated node. * * ========================================================================== ** -- cgit