From e9ea36e4d2270bd7d32da12ef6d6e2299641582d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Tridgell Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1998 05:07:05 +0000 Subject: tridge the destroyer returns! prompted by the interpret_security() dead code that Jean-Francois pointed out I added a make target "finddead" that finds potentially dead (ie. unused) code. It spat out 304 function names ... I went through these are deleted many of them, making others static (finddead also reports functions that are used only in the local file). in doing this I have almost certainly deleted some useful code. I may have even prevented compilation with some compile options. I apologise. I decided it was better to get rid of this code now and add back the one or two functions that are needed than to keep all this baggage. So, if I have done a bit too much "destroying" then let me know. Keep the swearing to a minimum :) One bit I didn't do is the ubibt code. Chris, can you look at that? Heaps of unused functions there. Can they be made static? (This used to be commit 2204475c87f3024ea8fd1fbd7385b2def617a46f) --- source3/utils/torture.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'source3/utils/torture.c') diff --git a/source3/utils/torture.c b/source3/utils/torture.c index 164bc4f743..2bee5f3769 100644 --- a/source3/utils/torture.c +++ b/source3/utils/torture.c @@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static void run_unlinktest(void) } /* generate a random buffer */ -void rand_buf(char *buf, int len) +static void rand_buf(char *buf, int len) { while (len--) { *buf = random(); -- cgit