From 71499fbe98b35b7253dbe158ba9d417adecefdc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Tridgell Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 07:40:13 +0000 Subject: avoided a memory leak in the ubi code by deleting a mangled cache entry before adding to ensure that we don't ever add a duplicate entry this code can be removed when ubi gets fixed (This used to be commit 062d79bf8ba5308803393c7b9140d1f77db3690f) --- source3/smbd/mangle.c | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'source3') diff --git a/source3/smbd/mangle.c b/source3/smbd/mangle.c index e47bcd896f..8ac91d49c8 100644 --- a/source3/smbd/mangle.c +++ b/source3/smbd/mangle.c @@ -465,7 +465,8 @@ static signed int cache_compare( ubi_btItemPtr ItemPtr, ubi_btNodePtr NodePtr ) */ static void cache_free_entry( ubi_trNodePtr WarrenZevon ) { - free( WarrenZevon ); + ZERO_STRUCTP(WarrenZevon); + free( WarrenZevon ); } /* cache_free_entry */ /* ************************************************************************** ** @@ -575,6 +576,15 @@ static void cache_mangled_name( char *mangled_name, char *raw_name ) s2 = (char *)&(s1[mangled_len + 1]); (void)StrnCpy( s1, mangled_name, mangled_len ); (void)StrnCpy( s2, raw_name, raw_len ); + + /* possibly delete an old entry - this avoids a memory leak in the + ubi code to do with overwriting existing entries. + + remove this test when ubi gets fixed */ + if (ubi_cacheGet(mangled_cache, s1)) { + ubi_cacheDelete(mangled_cache, s1); + } + ubi_cachePut( mangled_cache, i, new_entry, s1 ); } /* cache_mangled_name */ -- cgit