From bdc7d03c9c4e23af21c5a3f43b5470f196417af0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simo Sorce Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:50:06 +0000 Subject: r12769: Make ldb_next_request() evident, I was much confused on first sight Simo. (This used to be commit 2f0c7b896274e5e15e150c70d7ebe70355f6c4c0) --- source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/kludge_acl.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/kludge_acl.c') diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/kludge_acl.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/kludge_acl.c index cc6a0d18f4..5d982d0842 100644 --- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/kludge_acl.c +++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/kludge_acl.c @@ -85,11 +85,13 @@ static enum user_is what_is_user(struct ldb_module *module) /* search */ static int kludge_acl_search(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req) { - enum user_is user_type; - int ret = ldb_next_request(module, req); - struct ldb_message *msg; struct kludge_private_data *data = talloc_get_type(module->private_data, struct kludge_private_data); - int i, j; + struct ldb_message *msg; + enum user_is user_type; + int i, j, ret; + + /* go down the path and wait for reply to filter out stuff if needed */ + ret = ldb_next_request(module, req); /* We may not be fully initialised yet, or we might have just * got an error */ -- cgit