From 733fa19bc160b3aecfa15e0475042388e853969d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Tridgell Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:21:21 +1000 Subject: s4-samdb: internal s4 ldb modules should be GPL not LGPL I think these modules ended up LGPL because someone based the module on an existing LGPL module in the core ldb, and it spread from there. Certainly there is no reason for the ldb modules that are not distributed as part of ldb to be LGPL. --- source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition.c') diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition.c index e8b55a4e4b..dec905e000 100644 --- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition.c +++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition.c @@ -4,10 +4,6 @@ Copyright (C) Andrew Bartlett 2006 Copyright (C) Stefan Metzmacher 2007 - * NOTICE: this module is NOT released under the GNU LGPL license as - * other ldb code. This module is release under the GNU GPL v3 or - * later license. - This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or -- cgit