From ad9e4073574125b01b3992081be9b2a4d6852cbf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:41:10 +0200 Subject: Revert "s4:prefer "samdb_*_dn" basedn calls over the "ldb_get_*_dn" functions" We should use the "ldb_get_*_basedn" calls since they are available in the LDB library. --- source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/pdc_fsmo.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/pdc_fsmo.c') diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/pdc_fsmo.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/pdc_fsmo.c index 00d9a30fd3..0c5afd8e9c 100644 --- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/pdc_fsmo.c +++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/pdc_fsmo.c @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static int pdc_fsmo_init(struct ldb_module *module) return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; } - pdc_dn = samdb_base_dn(ldb); + pdc_dn = ldb_get_default_basedn(ldb); if (!pdc_dn) { ldb_debug(ldb, LDB_DEBUG_WARNING, "pdc_fsmo_init: no domain dn present: (skip loading of domain details)\n"); -- cgit