From 380874ef863866c94c999ef53252b9d30df65e88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simo Sorce Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:39:30 -0500 Subject: Fix the mess with ldb includes. Separate again the public from the private headers. Add a new header specific for modules. Also add service function for modules as now ldb_context and ldb_module are opaque structures for them. --- source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/subtree_rename.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/subtree_rename.c') diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/subtree_rename.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/subtree_rename.c index d3ceb8ad97..e2f6b1d059 100644 --- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/subtree_rename.c +++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/subtree_rename.c @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ * Author: Andrew Bartlett */ -#include "ldb_includes.h" +#include "ldb_module.h" struct subren_msg_store { struct subren_msg_store *next; @@ -47,11 +47,14 @@ struct subtree_rename_context { static struct subtree_rename_context *subren_ctx_init(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req) { + struct ldb_context *ldb; struct subtree_rename_context *ac; + ldb = ldb_module_get_ctx(module); + ac = talloc_zero(req, struct subtree_rename_context); if (ac == NULL) { - ldb_oom(module->ldb); + ldb_oom(ldb); return NULL; } @@ -66,10 +69,12 @@ static int subtree_rename_next_request(struct subtree_rename_context *ac); static int subtree_rename_callback(struct ldb_request *req, struct ldb_reply *ares) { + struct ldb_context *ldb; struct subtree_rename_context *ac; int ret; ac = talloc_get_type(req->context, struct subtree_rename_context); + ldb = ldb_module_get_ctx(ac->module); if (!ares) { return ldb_module_done(ac->req, NULL, NULL, @@ -82,7 +87,7 @@ static int subtree_rename_callback(struct ldb_request *req, } if (ares->type != LDB_REPLY_DONE) { - ldb_set_errstring(ac->module->ldb, "Invalid reply type!\n"); + ldb_set_errstring(ldb, "Invalid reply type!\n"); return ldb_module_done(ac->req, NULL, NULL, LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR); } @@ -104,14 +109,17 @@ static int subtree_rename_callback(struct ldb_request *req, static int subtree_rename_next_request(struct subtree_rename_context *ac) { + struct ldb_context *ldb; struct ldb_request *req; int ret; + ldb = ldb_module_get_ctx(ac->module); + if (ac->current == NULL) { return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; } - ret = ldb_build_rename_req(&req, ac->module->ldb, ac->current, + ret = ldb_build_rename_req(&req, ldb, ac->current, ac->current->olddn, ac->current->newdn, ac->req->controls, @@ -204,6 +212,7 @@ static int subtree_rename_search_callback(struct ldb_request *req, /* rename */ static int subtree_rename(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req) { + struct ldb_context *ldb; static const char *attrs[2] = { "distinguishedName", NULL }; struct ldb_request *search_req; struct subtree_rename_context *ac; @@ -212,6 +221,8 @@ static int subtree_rename(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req) return ldb_next_request(module, req); } + ldb = ldb_module_get_ctx(module); + /* This gets complex: We need to: - Do a search for all entires under this entry - Wait for these results to appear @@ -235,7 +246,7 @@ static int subtree_rename(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req) ac->current->newdn = req->op.rename.newdn; ac->list = ac->current; - ret = ldb_build_search_req(&search_req, module->ldb, ac, + ret = ldb_build_search_req(&search_req, ldb, ac, req->op.rename.olddn, LDB_SCOPE_SUBTREE, "(objectClass=*)", -- cgit