From e835621799647ee70630b389fb53d15b15d68355 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Tridgell Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 09:20:52 +0000 Subject: r8520: fixed a pile of warnings from the build farm gcc -Wall output on S390. This is an attempt to avoid the panic we're seeing in the automatic builds. The main fixes are: - assumptions that sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(int), mostly in printf formats - use of NULL format statements to perform dn searches. - assumption that sizeof() returns an int (This used to be commit a58ea6b3854973b694d2b1e22323ed7eb00e3a3f) --- source4/dsdb/samdb/samdb.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'source4/dsdb/samdb') diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/samdb.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/samdb.c index f51d3c6102..fd542c5567 100644 --- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/samdb.c +++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/samdb.c @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ NTTIME samdb_result_allow_password_change(struct ldb_context *sam_ldb, } minPwdAge = samdb_search_int64(sam_ldb, mem_ctx, 0, - domain_dn, "minPwdAge", NULL); + domain_dn, "minPwdAge", "dn=%s", domain_dn); /* yes, this is a -= not a += as minPwdAge is stored as the negative of the number of 100-nano-seconds */ @@ -447,7 +447,8 @@ NTTIME samdb_result_force_password_change(struct ldb_context *sam_ldb, return 0; } - maxPwdAge = samdb_search_int64(sam_ldb, mem_ctx, 0, domain_dn, "maxPwdAge", NULL); + maxPwdAge = samdb_search_int64(sam_ldb, mem_ctx, 0, domain_dn, + "maxPwdAge", "dn=%s", domain_dn); if (maxPwdAge == 0) { return 0; } else { @@ -655,7 +656,7 @@ static NTSTATUS _samdb_allocate_next_id(struct ldb_context *sam_ldb, TALLOC_CTX struct ldb_val vals[2]; struct ldb_message_element els[2]; - str = samdb_search_string(sam_ldb, mem_ctx, dn, attr, NULL); + str = samdb_search_string(sam_ldb, mem_ctx, dn, attr, "dn=%s", dn); if (!str) { DEBUG(1,("id not found at %s %s\n", dn, attr)); return NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_INVALID; -- cgit