From 98ce053efdf8f28aa0480663c0094fc9ca8939e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mwallnoefer@yahoo.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:43:43 +0200
Subject: s4:prefer "samdb_*_dn" basedn calls over the "ldb_get_*_dn" functions

Purely cosmetic change.
---
 source4/dsdb/samdb/cracknames.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'source4/dsdb')

diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/cracknames.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/cracknames.c
index 9430ce0a98..bce00bdb9d 100644
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/cracknames.c
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/cracknames.c
@@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ static WERROR DsCrackNameOneFilter(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, TALLOC_CTX *mem_
 			search_dn = samdb_result_dn(sam_ctx, mem_ctx, domain_res->msgs[0], "ncName", NULL);
 		} else {
 			dsdb_flags = DSDB_SEARCH_SEARCH_ALL_PARTITIONS;
-			search_dn = ldb_get_root_basedn(sam_ctx);
+			search_dn = samdb_root_dn(sam_ctx);
 		}
 
 		/* search with the 'phantom root' flag */
-- 
cgit