From 8919d6bf9a88ce9ac43dae61989c33082c984b66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simo Sorce <idra@samba.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 19:25:50 +0000
Subject: r10299: remove the public (un)lock functions and introduce a
 transaction based private ldb API

ldb_sqlite3 is already working with this model and ldb_tdb will do
as soon as tridge finishes the tdb transaction code.

currently the transactions are always implicit and wrap any single
ldb API call except searching, the transaction functions are
currently not made public on purpose.

Simo.
(This used to be commit 1da4ac2cdcb7e54076f85242a93784260dced918)
---
 source4/lib/ldb/tools/ldbtest.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'source4/lib/ldb/tools/ldbtest.c')

diff --git a/source4/lib/ldb/tools/ldbtest.c b/source4/lib/ldb/tools/ldbtest.c
index ef295b7411..68d3ab2484 100644
--- a/source4/lib/ldb/tools/ldbtest.c
+++ b/source4/lib/ldb/tools/ldbtest.c
@@ -64,11 +64,12 @@ static void add_records(struct ldb_context *ldb,
 	struct ldb_message msg;
 	int i;
 
+#if 0
         if (ldb_lock(ldb, "transaction") != 0) {
                 printf("transaction lock failed\n");
                 exit(1);
         }
-
+#endif
 	for (i=0;i<count;i++) {
 		struct ldb_message_element el[6];
 		struct ldb_val vals[6][1];
@@ -135,12 +136,12 @@ static void add_records(struct ldb_context *ldb,
 
 		talloc_free(tmp_ctx);
 	}
-
+#if 0
         if (ldb_unlock(ldb, "transaction") != 0) {
                 printf("transaction unlock failed\n");
                 exit(1);
         }
-
+#endif
 	printf("\n");
 }
 
-- 
cgit