From 5559f5e3e5b283a4fe85984589d61598b14fcfff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Metzmacher Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 14:39:46 +0000 Subject: r14891: fix a bug found by the ibm checker the problem was that we shift with <<= (privilege-1) and we called the function with privilege=0 add some checks to catch invalid privilege values and hide the mask representation in privilege.c metze (This used to be commit a69f000324764bcd4cf420f2ecba1aca788258e4) --- source4/libcli/security/privilege.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- source4/libcli/security/security_token.c | 17 +--------- 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) (limited to 'source4/libcli') diff --git a/source4/libcli/security/privilege.c b/source4/libcli/security/privilege.c index 202a418f6b..f81ff6dccc 100644 --- a/source4/libcli/security/privilege.c +++ b/source4/libcli/security/privilege.c @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static const struct { /* map a privilege id to the wire string constant */ -const char *sec_privilege_name(unsigned int privilege) +const char *sec_privilege_name(enum sec_privilege privilege) { int i; for (i=0;i 64) { + return NULL; + } for (i=0;i 64) { + return 0; + } + mask <<= (privilege-1); return mask; } @@ -186,9 +194,15 @@ uint64_t sec_privilege_mask(unsigned int privilege) /* return True if a security_token has a particular privilege bit set */ -BOOL sec_privilege_check(const struct security_token *token, unsigned int privilege) +BOOL sec_privilege_check(const struct security_token *token, enum sec_privilege privilege) { - uint64_t mask = sec_privilege_mask(privilege); + uint64_t mask; + + if (privilege < 1 || privilege > 64) { + return False; + } + + mask = sec_privilege_mask(privilege); if (token->privilege_mask & mask) { return True; } @@ -198,7 +212,30 @@ BOOL sec_privilege_check(const struct security_token *token, unsigned int privil /* set a bit in the privilege mask */ -void sec_privilege_set(struct security_token *token, unsigned int privilege) +void sec_privilege_set(struct security_token *token, enum sec_privilege privilege) { + if (privilege < 1 || privilege > 64) { + return; + } token->privilege_mask |= sec_privilege_mask(privilege); } + +void sec_privilege_debug(int dbg_lev, const struct security_token *token) +{ + DEBUGADD(dbg_lev, (" Privileges (0x%16llX):\n", + (unsigned long long) token->privilege_mask)); + + if (token->privilege_mask) { + int i = 0; + uint_t privilege; + + for (privilege = 1; privilege <= 64; privilege++) { + uint64_t mask = sec_privilege_mask(privilege); + + if (token->privilege_mask & mask) { + DEBUGADD(dbg_lev, (" Privilege[%3lu]: %s\n", (unsigned long)i++, + sec_privilege_name(privilege))); + } + } + } +} diff --git a/source4/libcli/security/security_token.c b/source4/libcli/security/security_token.c index 6e380a62ad..80644e1f2d 100644 --- a/source4/libcli/security/security_token.c +++ b/source4/libcli/security/security_token.c @@ -128,7 +128,6 @@ void security_token_debug(int dbg_lev, const struct security_token *token) { TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx; int i; - uint_t privilege; if (!token) { DEBUG(dbg_lev, ("Security token: (NULL)\n")); @@ -149,21 +148,7 @@ void security_token_debug(int dbg_lev, const struct security_token *token) dom_sid_string(mem_ctx, token->sids[i]))); } - DEBUGADD(dbg_lev, (" Privileges (0x%08X%08X):\n", - (uint32_t)((token->privilege_mask & 0xFFFFFFFF00000000LL) >> 32), - (uint32_t)(token->privilege_mask & 0x00000000FFFFFFFFLL))); - - if (token->privilege_mask) { - i = 0; - for (privilege = 0; privilege < 64; privilege++) { - uint64_t mask = sec_privilege_mask(privilege); - - if (token->privilege_mask & mask) { - DEBUGADD(dbg_lev, (" Privilege[%3lu]: %s\n", (unsigned long)i++, - sec_privilege_name(privilege))); - } - } - } + sec_privilege_debug(dbg_lev, token); talloc_free(mem_ctx); } -- cgit