From f5b0f7a5fe6811c49661577540aaed248eda33a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:56:04 +1100 Subject: Prove that not supporting ldapi is a bit problem. For a while now, ldapi support has been busted, but it was only tested when we were running against an external LDAP server. Andrew Bartlett (This used to be commit faf324cac613f9b74e1de46fe490f4973dab995c) --- source4/selftest/samba4_tests.sh | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'source4/selftest') diff --git a/source4/selftest/samba4_tests.sh b/source4/selftest/samba4_tests.sh index 32386e5b9e..bea4173555 100755 --- a/source4/selftest/samba4_tests.sh +++ b/source4/selftest/samba4_tests.sh @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ if grep ENABLE_GNUTLS.1 include/config.h > /dev/null; then plantest "ldb.ldaps with options $options" dc $samba4srcdir/../testprogs/blackbox/test_ldb.sh ldaps \$SERVER_IP $options done fi +plantest "ldb.ldapi with options $options" dc $samba4srcdir/../testprogs/blackbox/test_ldb.sh ldapi \$PREFIX_ABS/dc/private/ldapi $options for t in LDAP-CLDAP LDAP-BASIC LDAP-SCHEMA LDAP-UPTODATEVECTOR do plansmbtorturetest "$t" dc "-U\$USERNAME%\$PASSWORD" //\$SERVER_IP/_none_ -- cgit