From 05a9b7c32dd5831d2099a1c634d9380fe12a530e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:28:10 +0100 Subject: s4:smb_server/smb/trans2.c - "talloc_move" isn't strictly necessary here Since the "set" will be free'd afterwards "talloc_steal" is enough. Reviewed-by: Tridge --- source4/smb_server/smb/trans2.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'source4/smb_server/smb') diff --git a/source4/smb_server/smb/trans2.c b/source4/smb_server/smb/trans2.c index 416d6f04f1..0a6c014e88 100644 --- a/source4/smb_server/smb/trans2.c +++ b/source4/smb_server/smb/trans2.c @@ -1487,7 +1487,7 @@ static NTSTATUS dodc_or_sysvol_referral(TALLOC_CTX *ctx, NT_STATUS_HAVE_NO_MEMORY_AND_FREE(dc_list, context); for(j=0; jcount; j++) { - dc_list[num_dcs + j] = talloc_move(context, &set[i]->names[j]); + dc_list[num_dcs + j] = talloc_steal(context, set[i]->names[j]); } num_dcs = num_dcs + set[i]->count; TALLOC_FREE(set[i]); -- cgit