From 32d55960b5417fbee1af5d82960e6c2da58ec8a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:50:24 +0000 Subject: r24052: Fix some of the NT4 usrmgr.exe portions of bug 4815. - The icons in usermgr were incorrect, because the acct_flags were not filled in (due to missing attribute in ldb query) - The Full name was missing, and the description used as the full name (due to missing attributes in ldb query and incorrect IDL) To prove the correctness of these fixes, I added a substantial new test to RPC-SAMR-USERS, to ensure cross-consistancy between QueryDisplayInfo and QueryUserInfo on each user. This showed that for some reason, we must add ACB_NORMAL to the acct_flags on level 2 queries (for machine trust accounts)... Getting this right is important, because Samba3's RPC winbind methods uses these queries. Andrew Bartlett (This used to be commit 9475d94a61e36b3507e5fd2e6bb6f0667db4a607) --- source4/torture/rpc/samr.c | 206 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 195 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'source4/torture/rpc') diff --git a/source4/torture/rpc/samr.c b/source4/torture/rpc/samr.c index 7dad95d001..20a79a7d4f 100644 --- a/source4/torture/rpc/samr.c +++ b/source4/torture/rpc/samr.c @@ -3124,30 +3124,213 @@ static BOOL test_GetDisplayEnumerationIndex2(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, TALLOC_CTX * return ret; } +#define STRING_EQUAL_QUERY(s1, s2, user) \ + if (s1.string == NULL && s2.string != NULL && s2.string[0] == '\0') { \ + /* odd, but valid */ \ + } else if ((s1.string && !s2.string) || (s2.string && !s1.string) || strcmp(s1.string, s2.string)) { \ + printf("%s mismatch for %s: %s != %s (%s)\n", \ + #s1, user.string, s1.string, s2.string, __location__); \ + ret = False; \ + } +#define INT_EQUAL_QUERY(s1, s2, user) \ + if (s1 != s2) { \ + printf("%s mismatch for %s: 0x%x != 0x%x (%s)\n", \ + #s1, user.string, (unsigned int)s1, (unsigned int)s2, __location__); \ + ret = False; \ + } + +static BOOL test_each_DisplayInfo_user(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, + struct samr_QueryDisplayInfo *querydisplayinfo, + bool *seen_testuser) +{ + struct samr_OpenUser r; + struct samr_QueryUserInfo q; + struct policy_handle user_handle; + int i, ret = True; + NTSTATUS status; + r.in.domain_handle = querydisplayinfo->in.domain_handle; + r.in.access_mask = SEC_FLAG_MAXIMUM_ALLOWED; + for (i = 0; ; i++) { + switch (querydisplayinfo->in.level) { + case 1: + if (i >= querydisplayinfo->out.info.info1.count) { + return ret; + } + r.in.rid = querydisplayinfo->out.info.info1.entries[i].rid; + break; + case 2: + if (i >= querydisplayinfo->out.info.info2.count) { + return ret; + } + r.in.rid = querydisplayinfo->out.info.info2.entries[i].rid; + break; + case 3: + /* Groups */ + case 4: + case 5: + /* Not interested in validating just the account name */ + return true; + } + + r.out.user_handle = &user_handle; + + switch (querydisplayinfo->in.level) { + case 1: + case 2: + status = dcerpc_samr_OpenUser(p, mem_ctx, &r); + if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { + printf("OpenUser(%u) failed - %s\n", r.in.rid, nt_errstr(status)); + return False; + } + } + + q.in.user_handle = &user_handle; + q.in.level = 21; + status = dcerpc_samr_QueryUserInfo(p, mem_ctx, &q); + if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { + printf("QueryUserInfo(%u) failed - %s\n", r.in.rid, nt_errstr(status)); + return False; + } + + switch (querydisplayinfo->in.level) { + case 1: + if (seen_testuser && strcmp(q.out.info->info21.account_name.string, TEST_ACCOUNT_NAME) == 0) { + *seen_testuser = true; + } + STRING_EQUAL_QUERY(querydisplayinfo->out.info.info1.entries[i].full_name, + q.out.info->info21.full_name, q.out.info->info21.account_name); + STRING_EQUAL_QUERY(querydisplayinfo->out.info.info1.entries[i].account_name, + q.out.info->info21.account_name, q.out.info->info21.account_name); + STRING_EQUAL_QUERY(querydisplayinfo->out.info.info1.entries[i].description, + q.out.info->info21.description, q.out.info->info21.account_name); + INT_EQUAL_QUERY(querydisplayinfo->out.info.info1.entries[i].rid, + q.out.info->info21.rid, q.out.info->info21.account_name); + INT_EQUAL_QUERY(querydisplayinfo->out.info.info1.entries[i].acct_flags, + q.out.info->info21.acct_flags, q.out.info->info21.account_name); + + break; + case 2: + STRING_EQUAL_QUERY(querydisplayinfo->out.info.info2.entries[i].account_name, + q.out.info->info21.account_name, q.out.info->info21.account_name); + STRING_EQUAL_QUERY(querydisplayinfo->out.info.info2.entries[i].description, + q.out.info->info21.description, q.out.info->info21.account_name); + INT_EQUAL_QUERY(querydisplayinfo->out.info.info2.entries[i].rid, + q.out.info->info21.rid, q.out.info->info21.account_name); + INT_EQUAL_QUERY((querydisplayinfo->out.info.info2.entries[i].acct_flags & ~ACB_NORMAL), + q.out.info->info21.acct_flags, q.out.info->info21.account_name); + + if (!(querydisplayinfo->out.info.info2.entries[i].acct_flags & ACB_NORMAL)) { + printf("Missing ACB_NORMAL in querydisplayinfo->out.info.info2.entries[i].acct_flags on %s\n", + q.out.info->info21.account_name.string); + } + + if (!(q.out.info->info21.acct_flags & (ACB_WSTRUST))) { + printf("Found non-trust account %s in trust accoutn listing: 0x%x 0x%x\n", + q.out.info->info21.account_name.string, + querydisplayinfo->out.info.info2.entries[i].acct_flags, + q.out.info->info21.acct_flags); + return False; + } + + break; + } + + if (!test_samr_handle_Close(p, mem_ctx, &user_handle)) { + return False; + } + } + return ret; +} + static BOOL test_QueryDisplayInfo(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, struct policy_handle *handle) { NTSTATUS status; struct samr_QueryDisplayInfo r; + struct samr_QueryDomainInfo dom_info; BOOL ret = True; uint16_t levels[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; int i; + bool seen_testuser = false; for (i=0;iinfo2.num_users < r.in.start_idx) { + printf("QueryDomainInfo indicates that QueryDisplayInfo returned more users (%d/%d) than the domain %s is said to contain!\n", + r.in.start_idx, dom_info.out.info->info2.num_groups, + dom_info.out.info->info2.domain_name.string); + ret = False; + } + if (!seen_testuser) { + printf("Didn't find test user " TEST_ACCOUNT_NAME " in enumeration of %s\n", + dom_info.out.info->info2.domain_name.string); + ret = False; + } + break; + case 3: + case 5: + if (dom_info.out.info->info2.num_groups != r.in.start_idx) { + printf("QueryDomainInfo indicates that QueryDisplayInfo didn't return all (%d/%d) the groups in %s\n", + r.in.start_idx, dom_info.out.info->info2.num_groups, + dom_info.out.info->info2.domain_name.string); + ret = False; + } + + break; + } + } return ret; @@ -3811,8 +3994,10 @@ static BOOL test_OpenDomain(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, switch (which_ops) { case TORTURE_SAMR_USER_ATTRIBUTES: case TORTURE_SAMR_PASSWORDS: - ret &= test_CreateUser(p, mem_ctx, &domain_handle, NULL, which_ops); ret &= test_CreateUser2(p, mem_ctx, &domain_handle, which_ops); + ret &= test_CreateUser(p, mem_ctx, &domain_handle, &user_handle, which_ops); + /* This test needs 'complex' users to validate */ + ret &= test_QueryDisplayInfo(p, mem_ctx, &domain_handle); break; case TORTURE_SAMR_OTHER: ret &= test_CreateUser(p, mem_ctx, &domain_handle, &user_handle, which_ops); @@ -3826,7 +4011,6 @@ static BOOL test_OpenDomain(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, ret &= test_EnumDomainUsers_async(p, mem_ctx, &domain_handle); ret &= test_EnumDomainGroups(p, mem_ctx, &domain_handle); ret &= test_EnumDomainAliases(p, mem_ctx, &domain_handle); - ret &= test_QueryDisplayInfo(p, mem_ctx, &domain_handle); ret &= test_QueryDisplayInfo2(p, mem_ctx, &domain_handle); ret &= test_QueryDisplayInfo3(p, mem_ctx, &domain_handle); ret &= test_QueryDisplayInfo_continue(p, mem_ctx, &domain_handle); -- cgit