From c1efe587cfb9e4a49d2d88e92a5b0de93c89f558 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:32:21 +1000 Subject: We can't use ndr_pull_struct_blob_all in combinatin with relative pointers (This used to be commit 931890e028da8da756b7c7c62e2552a9fc04f7bc) --- source4/torture/rpc/dssync.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'source4/torture') diff --git a/source4/torture/rpc/dssync.c b/source4/torture/rpc/dssync.c index d340543f0a..0f2be55c38 100644 --- a/source4/torture/rpc/dssync.c +++ b/source4/torture/rpc/dssync.c @@ -566,9 +566,10 @@ static void test_analyse_objects(struct torture_context *tctx, } if (pull_fn) { - ndr_err = ndr_pull_struct_blob_all(&plain_data, ptr, - lp_iconv_convenience(tctx->lp_ctx), ptr, - pull_fn); + /* Can't use '_all' because of PIDL bugs with relative pointers */ + ndr_err = ndr_pull_struct_blob(&plain_data, ptr, + lp_iconv_convenience(tctx->lp_ctx), ptr, + pull_fn); if (NDR_ERR_CODE_IS_SUCCESS(ndr_err)) { ndr_print_debug(print_fn, name, ptr); } else { -- cgit From cb98944be3fd24a9ee9c7b4cef3732e68a8c1627 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:54:19 +1000 Subject: Assert on failure to join domain in NBT-DGRAM (This used to be commit 0a8080d0f245ddf0177195dd8e7fb3e1cdc0785f) --- source4/torture/nbt/dgram.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) (limited to 'source4/torture') diff --git a/source4/torture/nbt/dgram.c b/source4/torture/nbt/dgram.c index 665a08bd5c..eac2b1fe30 100644 --- a/source4/torture/nbt/dgram.c +++ b/source4/torture/nbt/dgram.c @@ -291,6 +291,10 @@ static bool nbt_test_netlogon2(struct torture_context *tctx) join_ctx = torture_join_domain(tctx, TEST_NAME, ACB_WSTRUST, &machine_credentials); + torture_assert(tctx, join_ctx != NULL, + talloc_asprintf(tctx, "Failed to join domain %s as %s\n", + lp_workgroup(tctx->lp_ctx), TEST_NAME)); + dom_sid = torture_join_sid(join_ctx); /* setup (another) temporary mailslot listener for replies */ -- cgit From 291b0dfb2a9cfff94e21c9cd17aa00345219765c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:49:54 +1000 Subject: Update RPC-LSA to (almost) pass against Windows 2008. (This used to be commit a17cb558c23142e522de3ed56d65c7694477395f) --- source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) (limited to 'source4/torture') diff --git a/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c b/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c index 4fb459ea25..98cbf12e68 100644 --- a/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c +++ b/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c @@ -614,7 +614,8 @@ bool test_many_LookupSids(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, if (!test_LookupNames(p, mem_ctx, handle, &names)) { return false; } - } else { + } else if (p->conn->security_state.auth_info->auth_type == DCERPC_AUTH_TYPE_SCHANNEL && + p->conn->security_state.auth_info->auth_level >= DCERPC_AUTH_LEVEL_INTEGRITY) { struct lsa_LookupSids3 r; struct lsa_TransNameArray2 names; @@ -884,6 +885,26 @@ static bool test_Delete(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, r.in.handle = handle; status = dcerpc_lsa_Delete(p, mem_ctx, &r); + if (!NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED)) { + printf("Delete should have failed NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED - %s\n", nt_errstr(status)); + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +static bool test_DeleteObject(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, + TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, + struct policy_handle *handle) +{ + NTSTATUS status; + struct lsa_DeleteObject r; + + printf("testing DeleteObject\n"); + + r.in.handle = handle; + r.out.handle = handle; + status = dcerpc_lsa_DeleteObject(p, mem_ctx, &r); if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { printf("Delete failed - %s\n", nt_errstr(status)); return false; @@ -912,7 +933,19 @@ static bool test_CreateAccount(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, r.out.acct_handle = &acct_handle; status = dcerpc_lsa_CreateAccount(p, mem_ctx, &r); - if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { + if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION)) { + struct lsa_OpenAccount r_o; + r_o.in.handle = handle; + r_o.in.sid = newsid; + r_o.in.access_mask = SEC_FLAG_MAXIMUM_ALLOWED; + r_o.out.acct_handle = &acct_handle; + + status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenAccount(p, mem_ctx, &r_o); + if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { + printf("OpenAccount failed - %s\n", nt_errstr(status)); + return false; + } + } else if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { printf("CreateAccount failed - %s\n", nt_errstr(status)); return false; } @@ -921,6 +954,10 @@ static bool test_CreateAccount(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, return false; } + if (!test_DeleteObject(p, mem_ctx, &acct_handle)) { + return false; + } + return true; } @@ -948,6 +985,10 @@ static bool test_DeleteTrustedDomain(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, return false; } + if (!test_DeleteObject(p, mem_ctx, &trustdom_handle)) { + return false; + } + return true; } @@ -986,7 +1027,7 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, struct lsa_SetSecret r7; struct lsa_QuerySecret r8; struct policy_handle sec_handle, sec_handle2, sec_handle3; - struct lsa_Delete d; + struct lsa_DeleteObject d_o; struct lsa_DATA_BUF buf1; struct lsa_DATA_BUF_PTR bufp1; struct lsa_DATA_BUF_PTR bufp2; @@ -1245,35 +1286,16 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, if (!r8.out.new_val || !r8.out.old_val) { printf("in/out pointers not returned, despite being set on in for QuerySecret\n"); ret = false; - } else if (r8.out.new_val->buf == NULL) { - if (i != LOCAL) { - printf("NEW secret buffer not returned after GLOBAL OLD set\n"); - ret = false; - } + } else if (r8.out.new_val->buf != NULL) { + printf("NEW secret buffer must not be returned after OLD set\n"); + ret = false; } else if (r8.out.old_val->buf == NULL) { - printf("OLD secret buffer not returned after OLD set\n"); + printf("OLD secret buffer was not returned after OLD set\n"); ret = false; } else if (r8.out.new_mtime == NULL || r8.out.old_mtime == NULL) { printf("Both times not returned after OLD set\n"); ret = false; } else { - if (i == LOCAL) { - printf("NEW secret buffer should not be returned after LOCAL OLD set\n"); - ret = false; - } - blob1.data = r8.out.new_val->buf->data; - blob1.length = r8.out.new_val->buf->length; - - blob2 = data_blob_talloc(mem_ctx, NULL, blob1.length); - - secret6 = sess_decrypt_string(mem_ctx, - &blob1, &session_key); - - if (strcmp(secret3, secret4) != 0) { - printf("Returned NEW secret '%s' doesn't match '%s'\n", secret4, secret3); - ret = false; - } - blob1.data = r8.out.old_val->buf->data; blob1.length = r8.out.old_val->buf->size; @@ -1287,14 +1309,7 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, ret = false; } - if (*r8.out.new_mtime == *r8.out.old_mtime) { - if (i != GLOBAL) { - printf("Returned secret %s had same mtime for both secrets: %s\n", - secname[i], - nt_time_string(mem_ctx, *r8.out.new_mtime)); - ret = false; - } - } else { + if (*r8.out.new_mtime != *r8.out.old_mtime) { printf("Returned secret %s should have had same mtime for both secrets: %s != %s\n", secname[i], nt_time_string(mem_ctx, *r8.out.old_mtime), @@ -1308,8 +1323,13 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, ret = false; } - d.in.handle = &sec_handle2; - status = dcerpc_lsa_Delete(p, mem_ctx, &d); + if (!test_DeleteObject(p, mem_ctx, &sec_handle)) { + return false; + } + + d_o.in.handle = &sec_handle2; + d_o.out.handle = &sec_handle2; + status = dcerpc_lsa_DeleteObject(p, mem_ctx, &d_o); if (!NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE)) { printf("Second delete expected INVALID_HANDLE - %s\n", nt_errstr(status)); ret = false; @@ -1454,9 +1474,9 @@ static bool test_EnumAccounts(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, return false; } - if (!test_LookupSids3(p, mem_ctx, &sids1)) { - return false; - } + /* Can't test lookupSids3 here, as clearly we must not + * be on schannel, or we would not be able to do the + * rest */ printf("testing all accounts\n"); for (i=0;idomains[i].sid) { trust.in.handle = handle; @@ -1912,8 +1932,6 @@ static bool test_EnumTrustDom(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, r_ex.in.max_size, LSA_ENUM_TRUST_DOMAIN_EX_MULTIPLIER, r_ex.in.max_size / LSA_ENUM_TRUST_DOMAIN_EX_MULTIPLIER); - ret = false; - exit(1); } } else if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(enum_status)) { printf("EnumTrustedDomainEx failed - %s\n", nt_errstr(enum_status)); @@ -2311,11 +2329,9 @@ bool torture_rpc_lsa(struct torture_context *tctx) ret = false; } -#if 0 if (!test_Delete(p, tctx, handle)) { ret = false; } -#endif if (!test_many_LookupSids(p, tctx, handle)) { ret = false; -- cgit From f7c13b1a959903f3bb64206c0335b1b3c3de3065 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:56:16 +1000 Subject: Make RPC-LSA test deterministic with an msleep(200). (This used to be commit 914e1865aa9fba417f74a3abdd8b4b2659feb001) --- source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'source4/torture') diff --git a/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c b/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c index 98cbf12e68..31dc38500d 100644 --- a/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c +++ b/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ #include "libcli/auth/libcli_auth.h" #include "torture/rpc/rpc.h" #include "param/param.h" - #define TEST_MACHINENAME "lsatestmach" static void init_lsa_String(struct lsa_String *name, const char *s) @@ -1162,7 +1161,7 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, &blob1, &session_key); if (strcmp(secret1, secret2) != 0) { - printf("Returned secret '%s' doesn't match '%s'\n", + printf("Returned secret (r4) '%s' doesn't match '%s'\n", secret2, secret1); ret = false; } @@ -1177,7 +1176,9 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, r5.in.new_val->data = enc_key.data; r5.in.new_val->length = enc_key.length; r5.in.new_val->size = enc_key.length; - + + + msleep(200); printf("Testing SetSecret (existing value should move to old)\n"); status = dcerpc_lsa_SetSecret(p, mem_ctx, &r5); @@ -1241,8 +1242,10 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, } if (*r6.out.new_mtime == *r6.out.old_mtime) { - printf("Returned secret %s had same mtime for both secrets: %s\n", + printf("Returned secret (r6-%d) %s must not have same mtime for both secrets: %s != %s\n", + i, secname[i], + nt_time_string(mem_ctx, *r6.out.old_mtime), nt_time_string(mem_ctx, *r6.out.new_mtime)); ret = false; } @@ -1310,7 +1313,7 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, } if (*r8.out.new_mtime != *r8.out.old_mtime) { - printf("Returned secret %s should have had same mtime for both secrets: %s != %s\n", + printf("Returned secret (r8) %s did not had same mtime for both secrets: %s != %s\n", secname[i], nt_time_string(mem_ctx, *r8.out.old_mtime), nt_time_string(mem_ctx, *r8.out.new_mtime)); -- cgit From 4eba234a7352094e1640e8ff9d80a20f8d4705a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:18:26 +1000 Subject: More LSA server and testuite work. - Implement QueryDomainInformationPolicy in Samba4 - Allow RPC-LSA to pass against Windows 2008 (which does not allow the Audit privilage to be removed) Andrew Bartlett (This used to be commit d94c7bbcd6eee6d975eac32a1d172f4164c97137) --- source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'source4/torture') diff --git a/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c b/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c index 31dc38500d..ec74426ac6 100644 --- a/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c +++ b/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c @@ -779,6 +779,7 @@ static bool test_LookupPrivName(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, static bool test_RemovePrivilegesFromAccount(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, + struct policy_handle *handle, struct policy_handle *acct_handle, struct lsa_LUID *luid) { @@ -801,7 +802,25 @@ static bool test_RemovePrivilegesFromAccount(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, status = dcerpc_lsa_RemovePrivilegesFromAccount(p, mem_ctx, &r); if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { - printf("RemovePrivilegesFromAccount failed - %s\n", nt_errstr(status)); + + struct lsa_LookupPrivName r_name; + + r_name.in.handle = handle; + r_name.in.luid = luid; + + status = dcerpc_lsa_LookupPrivName(p, mem_ctx, &r_name); + if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { + printf("\nLookupPrivName failed - %s\n", nt_errstr(status)); + return false; + } + /* Windows 2008 does not allow this to be removed */ + if (strcmp("SeAuditPrivilege", r_name.out.name->string) == 0) { + return ret; + } + + printf("RemovePrivilegesFromAccount failed to remove %s - %s\n", + r_name.out.name->string, + nt_errstr(status)); return false; } @@ -864,7 +883,7 @@ static bool test_EnumPrivsAccount(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, &r.out.privs->set[i].luid); } - ret &= test_RemovePrivilegesFromAccount(p, mem_ctx, acct_handle, + ret &= test_RemovePrivilegesFromAccount(p, mem_ctx, handle, acct_handle, &r.out.privs->set[0].luid); ret &= test_AddPrivilegesToAccount(p, mem_ctx, acct_handle, &r.out.privs->set[0].luid); @@ -2036,10 +2055,6 @@ static bool test_QueryDomainInfoPolicy(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, NTSTATUS status; int i; bool ret = true; - if (torture_setting_bool(tctx, "samba4", false)) { - printf("skipping QueryDomainInformationPolicy test against Samba4\n"); - return true; - } printf("\nTesting QueryDomainInformationPolicy\n"); @@ -2051,7 +2066,10 @@ static bool test_QueryDomainInfoPolicy(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, status = dcerpc_lsa_QueryDomainInformationPolicy(p, tctx, &r); - if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { + /* If the server does not support EFS, then this is the correct return */ + if (i == LSA_DOMAIN_INFO_POLICY_EFS && NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND)) { + continue; + } else if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { printf("QueryDomainInformationPolicy failed - %s\n", nt_errstr(status)); ret = false; continue; -- cgit