From a1abaa6ba90969a610b9a9ac4c1404d00206ce95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Tridgell Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 05:36:37 +0000 Subject: r2929: longhorn does not produce sorted directory listings! This is excellent, as it means we don't lose any compatibility by also not giving sorted listings. I was very much afraid that applications had begun to rely on this (as its guaranteed by w2k NTFS). no longer mark a non-sorting server as an error (This used to be commit 1d21c9a9d1879f5b3de15d251b6bb379c326002d) --- source4/torture/raw/search.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'source4/torture') diff --git a/source4/torture/raw/search.c b/source4/torture/raw/search.c index 2d73c8e34e..17673fd2b4 100644 --- a/source4/torture/raw/search.c +++ b/source4/torture/raw/search.c @@ -896,8 +896,7 @@ static BOOL test_sorted(struct smbcli_state *cli, TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx) if (StrCaseCmp(name1, name2) > 0) { printf("non-alphabetical order at entry %d '%s' '%s'\n", i, name1, name2); - printf("Server does not produce sorted directory listings\n"); - ret = False; + printf("Server does not produce sorted directory listings (not an error)\n"); goto done; } } -- cgit