From adf016e11946a354a140b1c0ed7789160e3af2aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:11:28 +1100 Subject: Fix use of wrong union arm in linked_attributes module This bug occours frequenetly in ldb users because the union so happens to be layed out that this works. However, it is still incorrect usage... Andrew Bartlett --- source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'source4') diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c index 190a66cdb3..bafd7e5ecf 100644 --- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c +++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int linked_attributes_add(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request * int ret; int i, j; - if (ldb_dn_is_special(req->op.mod.message->dn)) { + if (ldb_dn_is_special(req->op.add.message->dn)) { /* do not manipulate our control entries */ return ldb_next_request(module, req); } -- cgit