From 626bb8efb0c825f332c937ffaaadc9b402079539 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Derrell Lipman Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 20:17:37 +0000 Subject: r20517: re-add cleaned-up webapps (This used to be commit 5a3d6ad0b7cf0ecf8b57b4088b19f7d4291c990b) --- .../source/html/performance/LocalObject_2.html | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) create mode 100644 webapps/qooxdoo-0.6.3-sdk/frontend/demo/source/html/performance/LocalObject_2.html (limited to 'webapps/qooxdoo-0.6.3-sdk/frontend/demo/source/html/performance/LocalObject_2.html') diff --git a/webapps/qooxdoo-0.6.3-sdk/frontend/demo/source/html/performance/LocalObject_2.html b/webapps/qooxdoo-0.6.3-sdk/frontend/demo/source/html/performance/LocalObject_2.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..7a98805f2c --- /dev/null +++ b/webapps/qooxdoo-0.6.3-sdk/frontend/demo/source/html/performance/LocalObject_2.html @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ + + + + qooxdoo » Demo + + + + + + + +
+

JS Object Storage Performance

+ +

Test Description

+

Precreate 50.000 objects (locally stored). After this create 10.000 new (not stored) objects inside a loop.

+

As the loop will be executed inside the scope of "store", the browser must keep the information about "store" with each execution of "test", even if called from the timeout.

+ +

Result

+

The performance in IE is poor (~1150ms for each loop), compared to the same stuff executed without so much precreated objects (previous example).

+

It makes no difference if we use a global or a local variable here. It's identical to GlobalObject_2.html.

+
+ + + + -- cgit