From 1170417ceeb8c49a46cda522a38eaa71c9cae30c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Derrell Lipman Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 05:09:59 +0000 Subject: r20414: Start to make SWAT usable by others. This is just a start... (This used to be commit 26a34037a7ca6fbd05c5a6f7c2d5973e34bc6918) --- .../source/html/performance/LocalObject_4.html | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+) create mode 100644 webapps/qooxdoo-0.6.3-sdk/frontend/demo/source/html/performance/LocalObject_4.html (limited to 'webapps/qooxdoo-0.6.3-sdk/frontend/demo/source/html/performance/LocalObject_4.html') diff --git a/webapps/qooxdoo-0.6.3-sdk/frontend/demo/source/html/performance/LocalObject_4.html b/webapps/qooxdoo-0.6.3-sdk/frontend/demo/source/html/performance/LocalObject_4.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d633458e9c --- /dev/null +++ b/webapps/qooxdoo-0.6.3-sdk/frontend/demo/source/html/performance/LocalObject_4.html @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ + + + + qooxdoo » Demo + + + + + + + +

+

JS Object Storage Performance

+ +

Test Description

+

Precreate 50.000 objects (locally stored). After this create 10.000 new (not stored) objects inside a loop.

+

The "store" variable will be resetted after the first loop with "null".

+ +

Result

+

The additional cleanup (overwrite with null) of the global storage optimizes performance after the first loop. First loop is done after ~1150ms. The following loop needs ~350ms. Quite good. The same value as in the first example, where the data have never exist.

+

Interesting because theoratically the function implemenetation of "test" is inside the scope of "store".

+

+ + + + -- cgit