From 2e7c59c24470766e37309c7a8bfa4c7b81c57614 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Derrell Lipman Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 19:57:40 +0000 Subject: r20515: Continued work on the Web Application Framework. Until we get all of the functionality of the old scripts incorporated into the new framework, the old scripts need to still be available. I've reverted to having the old scripts be the default pages, and added an option to access the preview of the new SWAT. (This used to be commit b43620d4b8eff815f4a6dc02522a8dfc9fdcaef4) --- .../source/html/performance/LocalObject_5.html | 50 ---------------------- 1 file changed, 50 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 webapps/qooxdoo-0.6.3-sdk/frontend/demo/source/html/performance/LocalObject_5.html (limited to 'webapps/qooxdoo-0.6.3-sdk/frontend/demo/source/html/performance/LocalObject_5.html') diff --git a/webapps/qooxdoo-0.6.3-sdk/frontend/demo/source/html/performance/LocalObject_5.html b/webapps/qooxdoo-0.6.3-sdk/frontend/demo/source/html/performance/LocalObject_5.html deleted file mode 100644 index 34f351c688..0000000000 --- a/webapps/qooxdoo-0.6.3-sdk/frontend/demo/source/html/performance/LocalObject_5.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,50 +0,0 @@ - - - - qooxdoo » Demo - - - - - - - -
-

JS Object Storage Performance

- -

Test Description

-

Precreate 50.000 objects (locally stored). After this create 10.000 new (not stored) objects inside a loop.

-

The test method is implemented outside of the scope of "store".

- -

Result

-

We need no additional cleanup to get a good performance of the function. First loop is done after ~1150ms. The following loop needs ~350ms. Quite good. The same value as in the first example, where the data have never exist.

-
- - - - -- cgit