&author.tridge;
&author.jht;
May 26, 2003Securing SambaIntroduction
This note was attached to the Samba 2.2.8 release notes because it contains an
important security fix. The information contained here applies to Samba
installations in general.
A new apprentice reported for duty to the chief engineer of a boiler house. He said, Here I am,
if you will show me the boiler I'll start working on it. Then engineer replied, You're leaning
on it!
Security concerns are just like that. You need to know a little about the subject to appreciate
how obvious most of it really is. The challenge for most of us is to discover that first morsel
of knowledge with which we may unlock the secrets of the masters.
Features and Benefits
There are three levels at which security principles must be observed in order to render a site
at least moderately secure. They are the perimeter firewall, the configuration of the host
server that is running Samba, and Samba itself.
Samba permits a most flexible approach to network security. As far as possible Samba implements
the latest protocols to permit more secure MS Windows file and print operations.
Samba may be secured from connections that originate from outside the local network. This may be
done using host-based protection, using Samba's implementation of a technology
known as tcpwrappers, or it may be done be using interface-based exclusion
so &smbd; will bind only to specifically permitted interfaces. It is also
possible to set specific share or resource-based exclusions, for example, on the
autoshare. The share is used for browsing purposes as well as to establish
TCP/IP connections.
Another method by which Samba may be secured is by setting Access Control Entries (ACEs) in an Access
Control List (ACL) on the shares themselves. This is discussed in
File, Directory, and Share Access Controls.
Technical Discussion of Protective Measures and Issues
The key challenge of security is that protective measures suffice at best
only to close the door on known exploits and breach techniques. Never assume that
because you have followed these few measures, the Samba server is now an impenetrable
fortress! Given the history of information systems so far, it is only a matter of time
before someone will find yet another vulnerability.
Using Host-Based Protection
In many installations of Samba, the greatest threat comes from outside
your immediate network. By default, Samba accepts connections from
any host, which means that if you run an insecure version of Samba on
a host that is directly connected to the Internet, you can be
especially vulnerable.
One of the simplest fixes in this case is to use the and
options in the Samba &smb.conf; configuration file to
allow access to your server only from a specific range of hosts. An example might be:
127.0.0.1 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.3.0/240.0.0.0/0
The above will allow SMB connections only from localhost (your own
computer) and from the two private networks 192.168.2 and 192.168.3. All other
connections will be refused as soon as the client sends its first packet. The refusal
will be marked as not listening on called name error.
User-Based Protection
If you want to restrict access to your server to valid users only, then the following
method may be of use. In the &smb.conf; section put:
@smbusers, jacko
This restricts all server access either to the user jacko
or to members of the system group smbusers.
Using Interface Protection
By default, Samba accepts connections on any network interface that
it finds on your system. That means if you have an ISDN line or a PPP
connection to the Internet then Samba will accept connections on those
links. This may not be what you want.
You can change this behavior using options like this:
eth* loyes
This tells Samba to only listen for connections on interfaces with a
name starting with eth such as eth0 or eth1, plus on the loopback
interface called lo. The name you will need to use depends on what
OS you are using. In the above, I used the common name for Ethernet
adapters on Linux.
If you use the above and someone tries to make an SMB connection to
your host over a PPP interface called ppp0, then he or she will get a TCP
connection refused reply. In that case, no Samba code is run at all because
the operating system has been told not to pass connections from that
interface to any Samba process.
Using a Firewall
Many people use a firewall to deny access to services they do not
want exposed outside their network. This can be a good idea,
although I recommend using it in conjunction with the above
methods so you are protected even if your firewall is not active
for some reason.
If you are setting up a firewall, you need to know what TCP and
UDP ports to allow and block. Samba uses the following:
UDP/137 - used by nmbdUDP/138 - used by nmbdTCP/139 - used by smbdTCP/445 - used by smbd
The last one is important because many older firewall setups may not be
aware of it, given that this port was only added to the protocol in
recent years.
When configuring a firewall, the high order ports (1024-65535) are often
used for outgoing connections and therefore should be permitted through the
firewall. It is prudent to block incoming packets on the high order ports
except for established connections.
Using IPC$ Share-Based Denials
If the above methods are not suitable, then you could also place a
more specific deny on the IPC$ share that is used in the recently
discovered security hole. This allows you to offer access to other
shares while denying access to IPC$ from potentially untrustworthy
hosts.
To do this you could use:
192.168.115.0/24 127.0.0.10.0.0.0/0
This instructs Samba that IPC$ connections are not allowed from
anywhere except the two listed network addresses (localhost and the 192.168.115
subnet). Connections to other shares are still allowed. Because the
IPC$ share is the only share that is always accessible anonymously,
this provides some level of protection against attackers who do not
know a valid username/password for your host.
If you use this method, then clients will be given an `access denied'
reply when they try to access the IPC$ share. Those clients will not be able to
browse shares and may also be unable to access some other resources. This is not
recommended unless for some reason you cannot use one of the other methods just discussed.
NTLMv2 Security
To configure NTLMv2 authentication, the following registry keys are worth knowing about:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa]
"lmcompatibilitylevel"=dword:00000003
The value 0x00000003 means to send NTLMv2 response only. Clients will use NTLMv2 authentication;
use NTLMv2 session security if the server supports it. Domain controllers accept LM,
NTLM, and NTLMv2 authentication.
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\MSV1_0]
"NtlmMinClientSec"=dword:00080000
The value 0x00080000 means permit only NTLMv2 session security. If either NtlmMinClientSec or
NtlmMinServerSec is set to 0x00080000, the connection will fail if NTLMv2
session security is negotiated.
Upgrading Samba
Please check regularly on http://www.samba.org/ for updates and
important announcements. Occasionally security releases are made, and
it is highly recommended to upgrade Samba when a security vulnerability
is discovered. Check with your OS vendor for OS-specific upgrades.
Common Errors
If all of Samba and host platform configurations were really as intuitive as one might like them to be, this
section would not be necessary. Security issues are often vexing for a support person to resolve, not
because of the complexity of the problem, but because most administrators who post what turns
out to be a security problem request are totally convinced that the problem is with Samba.
Smbclient Works on Localhost, but the Network Is Dead
This is a common problem. Red Hat Linux (and others) installs a default firewall.
With the default firewall in place, only traffic on the loopback adapter (IP address 127.0.0.1)
is allowed through the firewall.
The solution is either to remove the firewall (stop it) or modify the firewall script to
allow SMB networking traffic through. See the Using a
firewall section.
Why Can Users Access Home Directories of Other Users?
We are unable to keep individual users from mapping to any other user's
home directory once they have supplied a valid password! They only need
to enter their own password. I have not found any method to configure
Samba so that users may map only their own home directory.
User xyzzy can map his home directory. Once mapped, user xyzzy can also map
anyone else's home directory.
This is not a security flaw, it is by design. Samba allows users to have
exactly the same access to the UNIX file system as when they were logged
onto the UNIX box, except that it only allows such views onto the file
system as are allowed by the defined shares.
If your UNIX home directories are set up so that one user can happily cd
into another user's directory and execute ls, the UNIX security solution is to change file
permissions on the user's home directories so that the cd and ls are denied.
Samba tries very hard not to second guess the UNIX administrator's security policies and
trusts the UNIX admin to set the policies and permissions he or she desires.
Samba allows the behavior you require. Simply put the %S
option in the share definition.
The works in conjunction with the list,
so to get the behavior you require, add the line:
%S
This is equivalent to adding
%S
to the definition of the share, as recommended in
the &smb.conf; man page.