Table of Contents
Before you continue reading this section, please make sure that you are comfortable with configuring a Samba Domain Controller as described in .
This is one of the most difficult chapters to summarize. It does not matter what we say here
for someone will still draw conclusions and/or approach the Samba Team with expectations
that are either not yet capable of being delivered, or that can be achieved far more
effectively using a totally different approach. In the event that you should have a persistent
concern that is not addressed in this book, please email
Samba-3 is capable of acting as a Backup Domain Controller (BDC) to another Samba Primary Domain Controller (PDC). A Samba-3 PDC can operate with an LDAP Account backend. The LDAP backend can be either a common master LDAP server, or a slave server. The use of a slave LDAP server has the benefit that when the master is down, clients may still be able to log onto the network. This effectively gives Samba a high degree of scalability and is an effective solution for large organizations. Do not use an LDAP slave server for a PDC, this may cause serious stability and operational problems.
While it is possible to run a Samba-3 BDC with non-LDAP backend, the administrator will need to figure out precisely what is the best way to replicate (copy/distribute) the user and machine accounts' backend.
The use of a non-LDAP backend SAM database is particularly problematic because Domain Member servers and workstations periodically change the Machine Trust Account password. The new password is then stored only locally. This means that in the absence of a centrally stored accounts database (such as that provided with an LDAP-based solution) if Samba-3 is running as a BDC, the BDC instance of the Domain Member trust account password will not reach the PDC (master) copy of the SAM. If the PDC SAM is then replicated to BDCs, this results in overwriting the SAM that contains the updated (changed) trust account password with resulting breakage of the domain trust.
Considering the number of comments and questions raised concerning how to configure a BDC, let's consider each possible option and look at the pros and cons for each possible solution. lists possible design configurations for a PDC/BDC infrastructure.
Table 6.1. Domain Backend Account Distribution Options
| PDC Backend | BDC Backend | Notes/Discussion |
|---|---|---|
Master LDAP Server | Slave LDAP Server | The optimal solution that provides high integrity. The SAM will be replicated to a common master LDAP server. |
Single Central LDAP Server | Single Central LDAP Server | A workable solution without fail-over ability. This is a useable solution, but not optimal. |
tdbsam | tdbsam + net rpc vampire | Does not work with Samba-3.0.0; may be implemented in a later release. The downside of this solution is that an external process will control account database integrity. This solution may appeal to sites that wish to avoid the complexity of LDAP. The net rpc vampire is used to synchronize domain accounts from the PDC to the BDC. |
tdbsam | tdbsam + rsync | Do not use this configuration. Does not work because the TDB files are live and data may not have been flushed to disk. Use rsync to synchronize the TDB database files from the PDC to the BDC. |
smbpasswd file | smbpasswd file | Do not use this configuration. Not an elegant solution due to the delays in synchronization. Use rsync to synchronize the TDB database files from the PDC to the BDC. Can be made to work using a cron job to synchronize data from the PDC to the BDC. |
A Domain Controller is a machine that is able to answer logon requests from network workstations. Microsoft LanManager and IBM LanServer were two early products that provided this capability. The technology has become known as the LanMan Netlogon service.
When MS Windows NT3.10 was first released, it supported a new style of Domain Control and with it a new form of the network logon service that has extended functionality. This service became known as the NT NetLogon Service. The nature of this service has changed with the evolution of MS Windows NT and today provides a complex array of services that are implemented over an intricate spectrum of technologies.
Whenever a user logs into a Windows NT4/200x/XP Professional Workstation, the workstation connects to a Domain Controller (authentication server) to validate that the username and password the user entered are valid. If the information entered does not match account information that has been stored in the Domain Control database (the SAM, or Security Account Manager database), a set of error codes is returned to the workstation that has made the authentication request.
When the username/password pair has been validated, the Domain Controller (authentication server) will respond with full enumeration of the account information that has been stored regarding that user in the User and Machine Accounts database for that Domain. This information contains a complete network access profile for the user but excludes any information that is particular to the user's desktop profile, or for that matter it excludes all desktop profiles for groups that the user may belong to. It does include password time limits, password uniqueness controls, network access time limits, account validity information, machine names from which the user may access the network, and much more. All this information was stored in the SAM in all versions of MS Windows NT (3.10, 3.50, 3.51, 4.0).
The account information (user and machine) on Domain Controllers is stored in two files, one containing the Security information and the other the SAM. These are stored in files by the same name in the C:\Windows NT\System32\config directory. These are the files that are involved in replication of the SAM database where Backup Domain Controllers are present on the network.
There are two situations in which it is desirable to install Backup Domain Controllers:
On the local network that the Primary Domain Controller is on, if there are many workstations and/or where the PDC is generally very busy. In this case the BDCs will pick up network logon requests and help to add robustness to network services.
At each remote site, to reduce wide area network traffic and to add stability to remote network operations. The design of the network, the strategic placement of Backup Domain Controllers, together with an implementation that localizes as much of network to client interchange as possible will help to minimize wide area network bandwidth needs (and thus costs).
The inter-operation of a PDC and its BDCs in a true Windows NT4 environemt is worth mentioning here. The PDC contains the master copy of the SAM. In the event that an administrator makes a change to the user account database while physically present on the local network that has the PDC, the change will likely be made directly to the PDC instance of the master copy of the SAM. In the event that this update may be performed in a branch office, the change will likely be stored in a delta file on the local BDC. The BDC will then send a trigger to the PDC to commence the process of SAM synchronization. The PDC will then request the delta from the BDC and apply it to the master SAM. The PDC will then contact all the BDCs in the Domain and trigger them to obtain the update and then apply that to their own copy of the SAM.
Samba-3 can not participate in true SAM replication and is therefore not able to employ precisely the same protocols used by MS Windows NT4. A Samba-3 BDC will not create SAM update delta files. It will not inter-operate with a PDC (NT4 or Samba) to synchronize the SAM from delta files that are held by BDCs.
Samba-3 cannot function as a BDC to an MS Windows NT4 PDC, and Samba-3 can not function correctly as a PDC to an MS Windows NT4 BDC. Both Samba-3 and MS Windows NT4 can function as a BDC to its own type of PDC.
The BDC is said to hold a read-only of the SAM from which it is able to process network logon requests and authenticate users. The BDC can continue to provide this service, particularly while, for example, the wide area network link to the PDC is down. A BDC plays a very important role in both the maintenance of Domain Security as well as in network integrity.
In the event that the NT4 PDC should need to be taken out of service, or if it dies, one of the NT4 BDCs can be promoted to a PDC. If this happens while the original NT4 PDC is on line, it is automatically demoted to an NT4 BDC. This is an important aspect of Domain Controller management. The tool that is used to effect a promotion or a demotion is the Server Manager for Domains. It should be noted that Samba-3 BDCs can not be promoted in this manner because reconfiguration of Samba requires changes to the smb.conf file.
Beginning with Version 2.2, Samba officially supports domain logons for all current Windows clients, including Windows NT4, 2003 and XP Professional. For Samba to be enabled as a PDC, some parameters in the [global]-section of the smb.conf have to be set. Refer to for an example of the minimum required settings.
Example 6.1. Minimal smb.conf for a PDC in Use With a BDC LDAP Server on PDC.
| workgroup = MIDEARTH |
| passdb backend = ldapsam://localhost:389 |
| domain master = yes |
| domain logons = yes |
Several other things like a [homes] and a [netlogon] share also need to be set along with settings for the profile path, the user's home drive, and so on. This is not covered in this chapter; for more information please refer to .
When configuring a master and a slave LDAP server, it is advisable to use the master LDAP server for the PDC and slave LDAP servers for the BDCs. It is not essential to use slave LDAP servers, however, many administrators will want to do so in order to provide redundant services. Of course, one or more BDCs may use any slave LDAP server. Then again, it is entirely possible to use a single LDAP server for the entire network.
When configuring a master LDAP server that will have slave LDAP servers, do not forget to configure this in the /etc/openldap/slapd.conf file. It must be noted that the DN of a server certificate must use the CN attribute to name the server, and the CN must carry the servers' fully qualified domain name. Additional alias names and wildcards may be present in the subjectAltName certificate extension. More details on server certificate names are in RFC2830.
It does not really fit within the scope of this document, but a working LDAP installation is basic to LDAP enabled Samba operation. When using an OpenLdap server with Transport Layer Security (TLS), the machine name in /etc/ssl/certs/slapd.pem must be the same as in /etc/openldap/sldap.conf. The Red Hat Linux startup script creates the slapd.pem file with hostname “localhost.localdomain.” It is impossible to access this LDAP server from a slave LDAP server (i.e., a Samba BDC) unless the certificate is recreated with a correct hostname.
Do not install a Samba PDC on a OpenLDAP slave server. Joining client machines to the domain will fail in this configuration because the change to the machine account in the LDAP tree must take place on the master LDAP server. This is not replicated rapidly enough to the slave server that the PDC queries. It therfore gives an error message on the client machine about not being able to set up account credentials. The machine account is created on the LDAP server but the password fields will be empty.
Possible PDC/BDC plus LDAP configurations include:
PDC+BDC -> One Central LDAP Server.
PDC -> LDAP master server, BDC -> LDAP slave server.
PDC -> LDAP master, with secondary slave LDAP server.
BDC -> LDAP master, with secondary slave LDAP server.
PDC -> LDAP master, with secondary slave LDAP server.
BDC -> LDAP slave server, with secondary master LDAP server.
In order to have a fall-back configuration (secondary) LDAP server one would specify the secondary LDAP server in the smb.conf file as shown in .
Example 6.2. Multiple LDAP Servers in smb.conf
| ... |
| passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://master.quenya.org |
| ldapsam:ldap://slave.quenya.org |
| ... |
As of the release of MS Windows 2000 and Active Directory, this information is now stored in a directory that can be replicated and for which partial or full administrative control can be delegated. Samba-3 is not able to be a Domain Controller within an Active Directory tree, and it cannot be an Active Directory server. This means that Samba-3 also cannot act as a Backup Domain Controller to an Active Directory Domain Controller.
Every machine that is a Domain Controller for the domain MIDEARTH has to register the NetBIOS group name MIDEARTH<#1c> with the WINS server and/or by broadcast on the local network. The PDC also registers the unique NetBIOS name MIDEARTH<#1b> with the WINS server. The name type <#1b> name is normally reserved for the Domain Master Browser, a role that has nothing to do with anything related to authentication, but the Microsoft Domain implementation requires the Domain Master Browser to be on the same machine as the PDC.
Where a WINS server is not used, broadcast name registrations alone must suffice. Refer to for more information regarding TCP/IP network protocols and how SMB/CIFS names are handled.
There are two different mechanisms to locate a domain controller, one method is used when NetBIOS over TCP/IP is enabled and the other when it has been disabled in the TCP/IP network configuration.
Where NetBIOS over TCP/IP is disabled, all name resolution involves the use of DNS, broadcast messaging over UDP, as well as Active Directory communication technologies. In this type of environment all machines require appropriate DNS entries. More information may be found in .
An MS Windows NT4/200x/XP Professional workstation in the domain MIDEARTH that wants a local user to be authenticated has to find the Domain Controller for MIDEARTH. It does this by doing a NetBIOS name query for the group name MIDEARTH<#1c>. It assumes that each of the machines it gets back from the queries is a Domain Controller and can answer logon requests. To not open security holes, both the workstation and the selected Domain Controller authenticate each other. After that the workstation sends the user's credentials (name and password) to the local Domain Controller for validation.
An MS Windows NT4/200x/XP Professional workstation in the realm quenya.org that has a need to affect user logon authentication will locate the Domain Controller by requerying DNS servers for the _ldap._tcp.pdc.ms-dcs.quenya.org record. More information regarding this subject may be found in .
The creation of a BDC requires some steps to prepare the Samba server before smbd is executed for the first time. These steps are outlines as follows:
The domain SID has to be the same on the PDC and the BDC. In Samba versions pre-2.2.5, the domain SID was stored in the file private/MACHINE.SID. The domain SID is now stored in the file private/secrets.tdb. This file is unique to each server and can not be copied from a PDC to a BDC, the BDC will generate a new SID at start-up. It will over-write the PDC domain SID with the newly created BDC SID. There is a procedure that will allow the BDC to aquire the Domain SID. This is described here.
To retrieve the domain SID from the PDC or an existing BDC and store it in the secrets.tdb, execute:
root# net rpc getsid
Specification of the ldap admin dn is obligatory. This also requires the LDAP administration password to be set in the secrets.tdb using the smbpasswd -w mysecret.
Either ldap suffix or ldap idmap suffix must be specified in the smb.conf file.
The UNIX user database has to be synchronized from the PDC to the BDC. This means that both the /etc/passwd and /etc/group have to be replicated from the PDC to the BDC. This can be done manually whenever changes are made. Alternately, the PDC is set up as an NIS master server and the BDC as an NIS slave server. To set up the BDC as a mere NIS client would not be enough, as the BDC would not be able to access its user database in case of a PDC failure. NIS is by no means the only method to synchronize passwords. An LDAP solution would also work.
The Samba password database must be replicated from the PDC to the BDC. Although it is possible to synchronize the smbpasswd file with rsync and ssh, this method is broken and flawed, and is therefore not recommended. A better solution is to set up slave LDAP servers for each BDC and a master LDAP server for the PDC.
The netlogon share has to be replicated from the PDC to the BDC. This can be done manually whenever login scripts are changed, or it can be done automatically using a cron job that will replicate the directory structure in this share using a tool like rsync.
Finally, the BDC has to be found by the workstations. This can be done by setting Samba as shown in .
Example 6.3. Minimal setup for being a BDC
| workgroup = MIDEARTH |
| passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://slave-ldap.quenya.org |
| domain master = no |
| domain logons = yes |
| idmap backend = ldapsam:ldap://slave-ldap.quenya.org |
In the [global]-section of the smb.conf of the BDC. This makes the BDC only register the name SAMBA<#1c> with the WINS server. This is no problem as the name SAMBA<#1c> is a NetBIOS group name that is meant to be registered by more than one machine. The parameter domain master = no forces the BDC not to register SAMBA<#1b> which as a unique NetBIOS name is reserved for the Primary Domain Controller.
The idmap backend will redirect the winbindd utility to use the LDAP database to resolve all UIDs and GIDs for UNIX accounts.
Samba-3 has introduced a new ID mapping facility. One of the features of this facility is that it allows greater flexibility in how user and group IDs are handled in respect to NT Domain User and Group SIDs. One of the new facilities provides for explicitly ensuring that UNIX/Linux UID and GID values will be consistent on the PDC, all BDCs and all Domain Member servers. The parameter that controls this is called idmap backend. Please refer to the man page for smb.conf for more information regarding its behavior.
The use of the idmap backend = ldap://master.quenya/org option on a BDC only make sense where ldapsam is used on a PDC. The purpose for an LDAP based idmap backend is also to allow a domain-member (without its own passdb backend) to use winbindd to resolve Windows network users and groups to common UID/GIDs. In other words, this option is generally intended for use on BDCs and on Domain Member servers.
As this is a rather new area for Samba, there are not many examples that we may refer to.
Updates will be published as they become available and may be found in later Samba releases or
from the Samba web
This problem will occur when the passdb (SAM) files are copied from a central server but the local Backup Domain Controller is acting as a PDC. This results in the application of Local Machine Trust Account password updates to the local SAM. Such updates are not copied back to the central server. The newer machine account password is then over written when the SAM is re-copied from the PDC. The result is that the Domain Member machine on start up will find that its passwords do not match the one now in the database and since the startup security check will now fail, this machine will not allow logon attempts to proceed and the account expiry error will be reported.
The solution is to use a more robust passdb backend, such as the ldapsam backend, setting up a slave LDAP server for each BDC, and a master LDAP server for the PDC.
No. The native NT4 SAM replication protocols have not yet been fully implemented.
Can I get the benefits of a BDC with Samba? Yes, but only to a Samba PDC.The main reason for implementing a BDC is availability. If the PDC is a Samba machine, a second Samba machine can be set up to service logon requests whenever the PDC is down.
Replication of the smbpasswd file is sensitive. It has to be done whenever changes to the SAM are made. Every user's password change is done in the smbpasswd file and has to be replicated to the BDC. So replicating the smbpasswd file very often is necessary.
As the smbpasswd file contains plain text password equivalents, it must not be sent unencrypted over the wire. The best way to set up smbpasswd replication from the PDC to the BDC is to use the utility rsync. rsync can use ssh as a transport. ssh itself can be set up to accept only rsync transfer without requiring the user to type a password.
As said a few times before, use of this method is broken and flawed. Machine trust accounts will go out of sync, resulting in a broken domain. This method is not recommended. Try using LDAP instead.