1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"><title>Chapter 15. Securing Samba</title><link rel="stylesheet" href="samba.css" type="text/css"><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.60.1"><link rel="home" href="index.html" title="SAMBA Project Documentation"><link rel="up" href="optional.html" title="Part III. Advanced Configuration"><link rel="previous" href="locking.html" title="Chapter 14. File and Record Locking"><link rel="next" href="InterdomainTrusts.html" title="Chapter 16. Interdomain Trust Relationships"></head><body bgcolor="white" text="black" link="#0000FF" vlink="#840084" alink="#0000FF"><div class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="3" align="center">Chapter 15. Securing Samba</th></tr><tr><td width="20%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="locking.html">Prev</a> </td><th width="60%" align="center">Part III. Advanced Configuration</th><td width="20%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="InterdomainTrusts.html">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr></div><div class="chapter" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title"><a name="securing-samba"></a>Chapter 15. Securing Samba</h2></div><div><div class="author"><h3 class="author"><span class="firstname">Andrew</span> <span class="surname">Tridgell</span></h3><div class="affiliation"><span class="orgname">Samba Team<br></span><div class="address"><p><tt class="email"><<a href="mailto:tridge@samba.org">tridge@samba.org</a>></tt></p></div></div></div></div><div><div class="author"><h3 class="author"><span class="firstname">John</span> <span class="othername">H.</span> <span class="surname">Terpstra</span></h3><div class="affiliation"><span class="orgname">Samba Team<br></span><div class="address"><p><tt class="email"><<a href="mailto:jht@samba.org">jht@samba.org</a>></tt></p></div></div></div></div><div><p class="pubdate">May 26, 2003</p></div></div><div></div></div><div class="toc"><p><b>Table of Contents</b></p><dl><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2929879">Introduction</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2929912">Features and Benefits</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928572">Technical Discussion of Protective Measures and Issues</a></dt><dd><dl><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928590">Using host based protection</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928659">User based protection</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928710">Using interface protection</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928760">Using a firewall</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928816">Using a IPC$ share deny</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928881">NTLMv2 Security</a></dt></dl></dd><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928920">Upgrading Samba</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928943">Common Errors</a></dt><dd><dl><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928962">Smbclient works on localhost, but the network is dead</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928987">Why can users access home directories of other users?</a></dt></dl></dd></dl></div><div class="sect1" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a name="id2929879"></a>Introduction</h2></div></div><div></div></div><p>
This note was attached to the Samba 2.2.8 release notes as it contained an
important security fix. The information contained here applies to Samba
installations in general.
</p><p>
A new apprentice reported for duty to the Chief Engineer of a boiler house. He said, "Here I am,
if you will show me the boiler I'll start working on it." Then engineer replied, "You're leaning
on it!"
</p><p>
Security concerns are just like that: You need to know a little about the subject to appreciate
how obvious most of it really is. The challenge for most of us is to discover that first morsel
of knowledge with which we may unlock the secrets of the masters.
</p></div><div class="sect1" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a name="id2929912"></a>Features and Benefits</h2></div></div><div></div></div><p>
There are three level at which security principals must be observed in order to render a site
at least moderately secure. These are: the perimeter firewall, the configuration of the host
server that is running Samba, and Samba itself.
</p><p>
Samba permits a most flexible approach to network security. As far as possible Samba implements
the latest protocols to permit more secure MS Windows file and print operations.
</p><p>
Samba may be secured from connections that originate from outside the local network. This may be
done using <span class="emphasis"><em>host based protection</em></span> (using samba's implementation of a technology
known as "tcpwrappers", or it may be done be using <span class="emphasis"><em>interface based exclusion</em></span>
so that <span class="application">smbd</span> will bind only to specifically permitted interfaces. It is also
possible to set specific share or resource based exclusions, eg: on the <i class="parameter"><tt>IPC$</tt></i>
auto-share. The <i class="parameter"><tt>IPC$</tt></i> share is used for browsing purposes as well as to establish
TCP/IP connections.
</p><p>
Another method by which Samba may be secured is by way of setting Access Control Entries in an Access
Control List on the shares themselves. This is discussed in the chapter on File, Directory and Share Access
Control.
</p></div><div class="sect1" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a name="id2928572"></a>Technical Discussion of Protective Measures and Issues</h2></div></div><div></div></div><p>
The key challenge of security is the fact that protective measures suffice at best
only to close the door on known exploits and breach techniques. Never assume that
because you have followed these few measures that the Samba server is now an impenetrable
fortress! Given the history of information systems so far, it is only a matter of time
before someone will find yet another vulnerability.
</p><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2928590"></a>Using host based protection</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p>
In many installations of Samba the greatest threat comes for outside
your immediate network. By default Samba will accept connections from
any host, which means that if you run an insecure version of Samba on
a host that is directly connected to the Internet you can be
especially vulnerable.
</p><p>
One of the simplest fixes in this case is to use the <i class="parameter"><tt>hosts allow</tt></i> and
<i class="parameter"><tt>hosts deny</tt></i> options in the Samba <tt class="filename">smb.conf</tt> configuration file to only
allow access to your server from a specific range of hosts. An example
might be:
</p><pre class="programlisting">
hosts allow = 127.0.0.1 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.3.0/24
hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0
</pre><p>
The above will only allow SMB connections from 'localhost' (your own
computer) and from the two private networks 192.168.2 and
192.168.3. All other connections will be refused as soon
as the client sends its first packet. The refusal will be marked as a
<span class="errorname">not listening on called name</span> error.
</p></div><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2928659"></a>User based protection</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p>
If you want to restrict access to your server to valid users only then the following
method may be of use. In the <tt class="filename">smb.conf</tt> <i class="parameter"><tt>[globals]</tt></i> section put:
</p><pre class="programlisting">
valid users = @smbusers, jacko
</pre><p>
What this does is, it restricts all server access to either the user <span class="emphasis"><em>jacko</em></span>
or to members of the system group <span class="emphasis"><em>smbusers</em></span>.
</p></div><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2928710"></a>Using interface protection</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p>
By default Samba will accept connections on any network interface that
it finds on your system. That means if you have a ISDN line or a PPP
connection to the Internet then Samba will accept connections on those
links. This may not be what you want.
</p><p>
You can change this behaviour using options like the following:
</p><pre class="programlisting">
interfaces = eth* lo
bind interfaces only = yes
</pre><p>
This tells Samba to only listen for connections on interfaces with a
name starting with 'eth' such as eth0, eth1, plus on the loopback
interface called 'lo'. The name you will need to use depends on what
OS you are using, in the above I used the common name for Ethernet
adapters on Linux.
</p><p>
If you use the above and someone tries to make a SMB connection to
your host over a PPP interface called 'ppp0' then they will get a TCP
connection refused reply. In that case no Samba code is run at all as
the operating system has been told not to pass connections from that
interface to any samba process.
</p></div><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2928760"></a>Using a firewall</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p>
Many people use a firewall to deny access to services that they don't
want exposed outside their network. This can be a very good idea,
although I would recommend using it in conjunction with the above
methods so that you are protected even if your firewall is not active
for some reason.
</p><p>
If you are setting up a firewall then you need to know what TCP and
UDP ports to allow and block. Samba uses the following:
</p><table class="simplelist" border="0" summary="Simple list"><tr><td>UDP/137 - used by nmbd</td></tr><tr><td>UDP/138 - used by nmbd</td></tr><tr><td>TCP/139 - used by smbd</td></tr><tr><td>TCP/445 - used by smbd</td></tr></table><p>
The last one is important as many older firewall setups may not be
aware of it, given that this port was only added to the protocol in
recent years.
</p></div><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2928816"></a>Using a IPC$ share deny</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p>
If the above methods are not suitable, then you could also place a
more specific deny on the IPC$ share that is used in the recently
discovered security hole. This allows you to offer access to other
shares while denying access to IPC$ from potentially untrustworthy
hosts.
</p><p>
To do that you could use:
</p><pre class="programlisting">
[ipc$]
hosts allow = 192.168.115.0/24 127.0.0.1
hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0
</pre><p>
this would tell Samba that IPC$ connections are not allowed from
anywhere but the two listed places (localhost and a local
subnet). Connections to other shares would still be allowed. As the
IPC$ share is the only share that is always accessible anonymously
this provides some level of protection against attackers that do not
know a username/password for your host.
</p><p>
If you use this method then clients will be given a <span class="errorname">access denied</span>
reply when they try to access the IPC$ share. That means that those
clients will not be able to browse shares, and may also be unable to
access some other resources.
</p><p>
This is not recommended unless you cannot use one of the other
methods listed above for some reason.
</p></div><div xmlns:ns42="" class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2928881"></a>NTLMv2 Security</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p>
To configure NTLMv2 authentication the following registry keys are worth knowing about:
</p><ns42:p>
</ns42:p><pre class="screen">
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa]
"lmcompatibilitylevel"=dword:00000003
0x3 - Send NTLMv2 response only. Clients will use NTLMv2 authentication,
use NTLMv2 session security if the server supports it. Domain
controllers accept LM, NTLM and NTLMv2 authentication.
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\MSV1_0]
"NtlmMinClientSec"=dword:00080000
0x80000 - NTLMv2 session security. If either NtlmMinClientSec or
NtlmMinServerSec is set to 0x80000, the connection will fail if NTLMv2
session security is not negotiated.
</pre><ns42:p>
</ns42:p></div></div><div class="sect1" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a name="id2928920"></a>Upgrading Samba</h2></div></div><div></div></div><p>
Please check regularly on <a href="http://www.samba.org/" target="_top">http://www.samba.org/</a> for updates and
important announcements. Occasionally security releases are made and
it is highly recommended to upgrade Samba when a security vulnerability
is discovered.
</p></div><div class="sect1" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a name="id2928943"></a>Common Errors</h2></div></div><div></div></div><p>
If all of samba and host platform configuration were really as intuitive as one might like then this
section would not be necessary. Security issues are often vexing for a support person to resolve, not
because of the complexity of the problem, but for reason that most administrators who post what turns
out to be a security problem request are totally convinced that the problem is with Samba.
</p><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2928962"></a>Smbclient works on localhost, but the network is dead</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p>
This is a very common problem. Red Hat Linux (as do others) will install a default firewall.
With the default firewall in place only traffic on the loopback adapter (IP address 127.0.0.1)
will be allowed through the firewall.
</p><p>
The solution is either to remove the firewall (stop it) or to modify the firewall script to
allow SMB networking traffic through. See section above in this chapter.
</p></div><div xmlns:ns43="" class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2928987"></a>Why can users access home directories of other users?</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p>
“<span class="quote">
We are unable to keep individual users from mapping to any other user's
home directory once they have supplied a valid password! They only need
to enter their own password. I have not found *any* method that I can
use to configure samba to enforce that only a user may map their own
home directory.
</span>”
</p><p>“<span class="quote">
User xyzzy can map his home directory. Once mapped user xyzzy can also map
*anyone* else's home directory!
</span>”</p><p>
This is not a security flaw, it is by design. Samba allows
users to have *exactly* the same access to the UNIX filesystem
as they would if they were logged onto the UNIX box, except
that it only allows such views onto the file system as are
allowed by the defined shares.
</p><p>
This means that if your UNIX home directories are set up
such that one user can happily cd into another users
directory and do an ls, the UNIX security solution is to
change the UNIX file permissions on the users home directories
such that the cd and ls would be denied.
</p><p>
Samba tries very hard not to second guess the UNIX administrators
security policies, and trusts the UNIX admin to set
the policies and permissions he or she desires.
</p><p>
Samba does allow the setup you require when you have set the
<i class="parameter"><tt>only user = yes</tt></i> option on the share, is that you have not set the
valid users list for the share.
</p><ns43:p>
Note that only user works in conjunction with the users= list,
so to get the behavior you require, add the line :
</ns43:p><pre class="programlisting">
users = %S
</pre><ns43:p>
this is equivalent to:
</ns43:p><pre class="programlisting">
valid users = %S
</pre><ns43:p>
to the definition of the <i class="parameter"><tt>[homes]</tt></i> share, as recommended in
the <tt class="filename">smb.conf</tt> man page.
</ns43:p></div></div></div><div class="navfooter"><hr><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="locking.html">Prev</a> </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="optional.html">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="InterdomainTrusts.html">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">Chapter 14. File and Record Locking </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"> Chapter 16. Interdomain Trust Relationships</td></tr></table></div></body></html>
|
