summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source3/CodingSuggestions
blob: aa19c16d85066f638789adf357599d2bb7471b89 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
So you want to add code to Samba ...

One of the daunting tasks facing a programmer attempting to write code for
Samba is understanding the various coding conventions used by those most
active in the project.  These conventions were mostly unwritten and helped
improve either the portability, stability or consistency of the code. This
document will attempt to document a few of the more important coding
practices used at this time on the Samba project.  The coding practices are
expected to change slightly over time, and even to grow as more is learned
about obscure portability considerations.  Two existing documents
samba/source/internals.doc and samba/source/architecture.doc provide
additional information.

The loosely related question of coding style is very personal and this
document does not attempt to address that subject, except to say that I
have observed that eight character tabs seem to be preferred in Samba
source.  If you are interested in the topic of coding style, two oft-quoted
documents are:

   http://lxr.linux.no/source/Documentation/CodingStyle
   http://www.fsf.org/prep/standards_toc.html

but note that coding style in Samba varies due to the many different
programmers who have contributed.

Following are some considerations you should use when adding new code to
Samba.  First and foremost remember that:

Portability is a primary consideration in adding function, as is network
compatability with de facto, existing, real world CIFS/SMB implementations.
There are lots of platforms that Samba builds on so use caution when adding
a call to a library function that is not invoked in existing Samba code.
Also note that there are many quite different SMB/CIFS clients that Samba
tries to support, not all of which follow the SNIA CIFS Technical Reference
(or the earlier Microsoft reference documents or the X/Open book on the SMB
Standard) perfectly.

Here are some other suggestions:

1) use d_printf instead of printf for display text
	reason: enable auto-substitution of translated language text 

2) use SAFE_FREE instead of free
	reason: reduce traps due to null pointers

3) don't use bzero use memset, or ZERO_STRUCT and ZERO_STRUCTP macros
	reason: not POSIX

4) don't use strcpy and strlen (use safe_* equivalents)
	reason: to avoid traps due to buffer overruns

5) don't use getopt_long, use popt functions instead
	reason: portability

6) explicitly add const qualifiers on parm passing in functions where parm
   is input only (somewhat controversial but const can be #defined away)

8) discourage use of threads
        reason: portability (also see architecture.doc)

9) don't explicitly include new header files in C files - new h files 
   should be included by adding them once to includes.h
	reason: consistency

10) don't explicitly extern functions (they are autogenerated by 
    "make proto" into proto.h)
	reason: consistency

11) use endian safe macros when unpacking SMBs (see byteorder.h and
    internals.doc)
	reason: not everyone uses Intel

12) Note Unicode implications of charset handling (see internals.doc).  See
    pull_*  and push_* and convert_string functions.
	reason: Internationalization

13) Don't assume English only
	reason: See above

14) Try to avoid using in/out parameters (functions that return data which
    overwrites input parameters)
	reason: Can cause stability problems

15) Ensure copyright notices are correct, don't append Tridge's name to code
    that he didn't write.  If you did not write the code, make sure that it
    can coexist with the rest of the Samba GPLed code.

16) Consider usage of DATA_BLOBs for length specified byte-data.
	reason: stability

17) Take advantage of tdbs for database like function
	reason: consistency

18) Don't access the SAM_ACCOUNT structure directly, they should be accessed
    via pdb_get...() and pdb_set...() functions.
	reason: stability, consistency

19) Don't check a password directly against the passdb, always use the
    check_password() interface.
	reason: long term pluggability

20) Try to use asprintf rather than pstrings and fstrings where possible

21) Use normal C comments /* like this */ instead of C++ comments // like
    this.  Although the C++ comment format is part of the C99 standard,
    some older vendor C compilers do not accept it.

The suggestions above are simply that, suggestions, but the information may
help in reducing the routine rework done on new code.  The preceeding list
is expected to change routinely as new support routines and macros are
added.

Written by Steve French, with contributions from Simo Sorce and Andrew
Bartlett.