1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
|
/*
Unix SMB/Netbios implementation.
Version 3.0
Samba select/poll implementation
Copyright (C) Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
*/
#include "includes.h"
/* This is here because it allows us to avoid a nasty race in signal handling.
We need to guarantee that when we get a signal we get out of a select immediately
but doing that involves a race condition. We can avoid the race by getting the
signal handler to write to a pipe that is in the select/poll list
This means all Samba signal handlers should call sys_select_signal().
*/
static pid_t initialised;
static int select_pipe[2];
static VOLATILE unsigned pipe_written, pipe_read;
/*******************************************************************
Call this from all Samba signal handlers if you want to avoid a
nasty signal race condition.
********************************************************************/
void sys_select_signal(void)
{
char c = 1;
if (!initialised) return;
if (pipe_written > pipe_read+256) return;
if (write(select_pipe[1], &c, 1) == 1) pipe_written++;
}
/*******************************************************************
Like select() but avoids the signal race using a pipe
it also guuarantees that fds on return only ever contains bits set
for file descriptors that were readable.
********************************************************************/
int sys_select(int maxfd, fd_set *readfds, fd_set *writefds, fd_set *errorfds, struct timeval *tval)
{
int ret, saved_errno;
fd_set *readfds2, readfds_buf;
if (initialised != sys_getpid()) {
pipe(select_pipe);
/*
* These next two lines seem to fix a bug with the Linux
* 2.0.x kernel (and probably other UNIXes as well) where
* the one byte read below can block even though the
* select returned that there is data in the pipe and
* the pipe_written variable was incremented. Thanks to
* HP for finding this one. JRA.
*/
if(set_blocking(select_pipe[0],0)==-1)
smb_panic("select_pipe[0]: O_NONBLOCK failed.\n");
if(set_blocking(select_pipe[1],0)==-1)
smb_panic("select_pipe[1]: O_NONBLOCK failed.\n");
initialised = sys_getpid();
}
maxfd = MAX(select_pipe[0]+1, maxfd);
/* If readfds is NULL we need to provide our own set. */
if (readfds) {
readfds2 = readfds;
} else {
readfds2 = &readfds_buf;
FD_ZERO(readfds2);
}
FD_SET(select_pipe[0], readfds2);
errno = 0;
ret = select(maxfd,readfds2,writefds,errorfds,tval);
if (ret <= 0) {
FD_ZERO(readfds2);
if (writefds)
FD_ZERO(writefds);
if (errorfds)
FD_ZERO(errorfds);
}
if (FD_ISSET(select_pipe[0], readfds2)) {
FD_CLR(select_pipe[0], readfds2);
ret--;
if (ret == 0) {
ret = -1;
errno = EINTR;
}
}
saved_errno = errno;
while (pipe_written != pipe_read) {
char c;
/* Due to the linux kernel bug in 2.0.x, we
* always increment here even if the read failed... */
read(select_pipe[0], &c, 1);
pipe_read++;
}
errno = saved_errno;
return ret;
}
/*******************************************************************
Similar to sys_select() but catch EINTR and continue.
This is what sys_select() used to do in Samba.
********************************************************************/
int sys_select_intr(int maxfd, fd_set *readfds, fd_set *writefds, fd_set *errorfds, struct timeval *tval)
{
int ret;
fd_set *readfds2, readfds_buf, *writefds2, writefds_buf, *errorfds2, errorfds_buf;
struct timeval tval2, *ptval;
readfds2 = (readfds ? &readfds_buf : NULL);
writefds2 = (writefds ? &writefds_buf : NULL);
errorfds2 = (errorfds ? &errorfds_buf : NULL);
ptval = (tval ? &tval2 : NULL);
do {
if (readfds)
readfds_buf = *readfds;
if (writefds)
writefds_buf = *writefds;
if (errorfds)
errorfds_buf = *errorfds;
if (tval)
tval2 = *tval;
ret = sys_select(maxfd, readfds2, writefds2, errorfds2, ptval);
} while (ret == -1 && errno == EINTR);
if (readfds)
*readfds = readfds_buf;
if (writefds)
*writefds = writefds_buf;
if (errorfds)
*errorfds = errorfds_buf;
return ret;
}
|
