1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
|
Network Working Group K. Zeilenga
Request for Comments: 4529 OpenLDAP Foundation
Category: Informational June 2006
Requesting Attributes by Object Class in the
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)
Status of This Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
Abstract
The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) search operation
provides mechanisms for clients to request all user application
attributes, all operational attributes, and/or attributes selected by
their description. This document extends LDAP to support a mechanism
that LDAP clients may use to request the return of all attributes of
an object class.
Table of Contents
1. Background and Intended Use .....................................1
2. Terminology .....................................................2
3. Return of all Attributes of an Object Class .....................2
4. Security Considerations .........................................3
5. IANA Considerations .............................................3
6. References ......................................................4
6.1. Normative References .......................................4
6.2. Informative References .....................................4
1. Background and Intended Use
In the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) [RFC4510], the
search operation [RFC4511] supports requesting the return of a set of
attributes. This set is determined by a list of attribute
descriptions. Two special descriptors are defined to request all
user attributes ("*") [RFC4511] and all operational attributes ("+")
[RFC3673]. However, there is no convenient mechanism for requesting
pre-defined sets of attributes such as the set of attributes used to
represent a particular class of object.
Zeilenga Informational [Page 1]
RFC 4529 Requesting Attributes by Object Class June 2006
This document extends LDAP to allow an object class identifier to be
specified in attributes lists, such as in Search requests, to request
the return of all attributes belonging to an object class. The
COMMERCIAL AT ("@", U+0040) character is used to distinguish an
object class identifier from an attribute descriptions.
For example, the attribute list of "@country" is equivalent to the
attribute list of 'c', 'searchGuide', 'description', and
'objectClass'. This object class is described in [RFC4519].
This extension is intended primarily to be used where the user is in
direct control of the parameters of the LDAP search operation, for
instance when entering an LDAP URL [RFC4516] into a web browser, such
as <ldap:///dc=example,dc=com?@organization?base>.
2. Terminology
In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED",
"SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY",
and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14
[RFC2119].
DSA stands for Directory System Agent (or server).
DSE stands for DSA-specific Entry.
3. Return of All Attributes of an Object Class
This extension allows object class identifiers to be provided in the
attributes field of the LDAP SearchRequest [RFC4511] or other request
values of the AttributeSelection data type (e.g., attributes field in
pre/post read controls [ReadEntry]) and/or <attributeSelector>
production (e.g., attributes of an LDAP URL [RFC4516]). For each
object class identified in the attributes field, the request is to be
treated as if each attribute allowed by that class (by "MUST" or
"MAY", directly or by "SUP"erior) [RFC4512] were itself listed.
This extension extends the <attributeSelector> [RFC4511] production
as indicated by the following ABNF [RFC4234]:
attributeSelector =/ objectclassdescription
objectclassdescription = ATSIGN oid options
ATSIGN = %x40 ; COMMERCIAL AT ("@" U+0040)
where <oid> and <options> productions are as defined in [RFC4512].
Zeilenga Informational [Page 2]
RFC 4529 Requesting Attributes by Object Class June 2006
The <oid> component of an <objectclassdescription> production
identifies the object class by short name (descr) or object
identifier (numericoid). If the value of the <oid> component is
unrecognized or does not refer to an object class, the object class
description is to be treated as an unrecognized attribute
description.
The <options> production is included in the grammar for extensibility
purposes. An object class description with an unrecognized or
inappropriate option is to be treated as unrecognized.
Although object class description options and attribute description
options share the same syntax, they are not semantically related.
This document does not define any object description option.
Servers supporting this feature SHOULD publish the object identifier
(OID) 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.5.2 as a value of the 'supportedFeatures'
[RFC4512] attribute in the root DSE. Clients supporting this feature
SHOULD NOT use the feature unless they know that the server supports
it.
4. Security Considerations
This extension provides a shorthand for requesting all attributes of
an object class. Because these attributes could have been listed
individually, introduction of this shorthand is not believed to raise
additional security considerations.
Implementors of this LDAP extension should be familiar with security
considerations applicable to the LDAP search operation [RFC4511], as
well as with general LDAP security considerations [RFC4510].
5. IANA Considerations
Registration of the LDAP Protocol Mechanism [RFC4520] defined in this
document has been completed.
Subject: Request for LDAP Protocol Mechanism Registration
Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.5.2
Description: OC AD Lists
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@openldap.org>
Usage: Feature
Specification: RFC 4529
Author/Change Controller: Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@openldap.org>
Comments: none
Zeilenga Informational [Page 3]
RFC 4529 Requesting Attributes by Object Class June 2006
This OID was assigned [ASSIGN] by OpenLDAP Foundation, under its
IANA-assigned private enterprise allocation [PRIVATE], for use in
this specification.
6. References
6.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC4234] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for
Syntax Specifications: ABNF", RFC 4234, October 2005.
[RFC4510] Zeilenga, K., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access
Protocol (LDAP): Technical Specification Road Map", RFC
4510, June 2006.
[RFC4511] Sermersheim, J., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access
Protocol (LDAP): The Protocol", RFC 4511, June 2006.
[RFC4512] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
(LDAP): Directory Information Models", RFC 4512, June
2006.
[RFC4516] Smith, M., Ed. and T. Howes, "Lightweight Directory
Access Protocol (LDAP): Uniform Resource Locator", RFC
4516, June 2006.
[X.680] International Telecommunication Union -
Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "Abstract
Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) - Specification of Basic
Notation", X.680(2002) (also ISO/IEC 8824-1:2002).
6.2. Informative References
[RFC3673] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
version 3 (LDAPv3): All Operational Attributes", RFC
3673, December 2003.
[RFC4519] Sciberras, A., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access
Protocol (LDAP): Schema for User Applications", RFC
4519, June 2006.
[RFC4520] Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
(IANA) Considerations for the Lightweight Directory
Access Protocol (LDAP)", BCP 64, RFC 4520, June 2006.
Zeilenga Informational [Page 4]
RFC 4529 Requesting Attributes by Object Class June 2006
[ReadEntry] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
(LDAP) Read Entry Controls", RFC 4527, June 2006.
[ASSIGN] OpenLDAP Foundation, "OpenLDAP OID Delegations",
http://www.openldap.org/foundation/oid-delegate.txt.
[PRIVATE] IANA, "Private Enterprise Numbers",
http://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers.
Author's Address
Kurt D. Zeilenga
OpenLDAP Foundation
EMail: Kurt@OpenLDAP.org
Zeilenga Informational [Page 5]
RFC 4529 Requesting Attributes by Object Class June 2006
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
Zeilenga Informational [Page 6]
|
