diff options
author | Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org> | 2012-06-29 16:50:38 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org> | 2012-07-06 10:00:57 +0200 |
commit | 39a13d19815890587ba48e2a79ac9650bb034f5c (patch) | |
tree | ee00f59f45d6040afc85a159d4656fbc9fa75990 | |
parent | 4ece074f256062deeac5783d209cafd441120a9e (diff) | |
download | samba-39a13d19815890587ba48e2a79ac9650bb034f5c.tar.gz samba-39a13d19815890587ba48e2a79ac9650bb034f5c.tar.bz2 samba-39a13d19815890587ba48e2a79ac9650bb034f5c.zip |
s4-torture: Add a lsarpc test_OpenPolicy_fail function.
-rw-r--r-- | source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c | 91 |
1 files changed, 74 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c b/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c index 2e71c8835c..7c7121fa1a 100644 --- a/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c +++ b/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c @@ -40,8 +40,7 @@ static void init_lsa_String(struct lsa_String *name, const char *s) } static bool test_OpenPolicy(struct dcerpc_binding_handle *b, - struct torture_context *tctx, - bool test_fail) /* check if the tests fails! */ + struct torture_context *tctx) { struct lsa_ObjectAttribute attr; struct policy_handle handle; @@ -70,21 +69,79 @@ static bool test_OpenPolicy(struct dcerpc_binding_handle *b, torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(tctx, dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b, tctx, &r), "OpenPolicy failed"); + + torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(tctx, + r.out.result, + "OpenPolicy failed"); + + return true; +} + +static bool test_OpenPolicy_fail(struct dcerpc_binding_handle *b, + struct torture_context *tctx) +{ + struct lsa_ObjectAttribute attr; + struct policy_handle handle; + struct lsa_QosInfo qos; + struct lsa_OpenPolicy r; + uint16_t system_name = '\\'; + NTSTATUS status; + + torture_comment(tctx, "\nTesting OpenPolicy_fail\n"); + + qos.len = 0; + qos.impersonation_level = 2; + qos.context_mode = 1; + qos.effective_only = 0; + + attr.len = 0; + attr.root_dir = NULL; + attr.object_name = NULL; + attr.attributes = 0; + attr.sec_desc = NULL; + attr.sec_qos = &qos; + + r.in.system_name = &system_name; + r.in.attr = &attr; + r.in.access_mask = SEC_FLAG_MAXIMUM_ALLOWED; + r.out.handle = &handle; + + status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b, tctx, &r); + if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { + if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED)) { + torture_comment(tctx, + "OpenPolicy correctly returned with " + "status: %s\n", + nt_errstr(status)); + return true; + } + + torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(tctx, + status, + NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED, + "OpenPolicy return value should " + "be ACCESS_DENIED"); + return true; + } + if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(r.out.result)) { if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(r.out.result, NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED) || NT_STATUS_EQUAL(r.out.result, NT_STATUS_RPC_PROTSEQ_NOT_SUPPORTED)) { - if (test_fail) { - torture_comment(tctx, "not considering %s to be an error\n", - nt_errstr(r.out.result)); - return true; - } + torture_comment(tctx, + "OpenPolicy correctly returned with " + "result: %s\n", + nt_errstr(r.out.result)); + return true; } - torture_comment(tctx, "OpenPolicy failed - %s\n", - nt_errstr(r.out.result)); - return false; } - return true; + torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(tctx, + r.out.result, + NT_STATUS_OK, + "OpenPolicy return value should be " + "ACCESS_DENIED"); + + return false; } @@ -573,7 +630,7 @@ static bool test_LookupNames4_fail(struct dcerpc_binding_handle *b, struct lsa_LookupNames4 r; struct lsa_TransSidArray3 sids; struct lsa_RefDomainList *domains = NULL; - struct lsa_String *names; + struct lsa_String *names = NULL; uint32_t count = 0; NTSTATUS status; @@ -3204,7 +3261,7 @@ bool torture_rpc_lsa(struct torture_context *tctx) /* Test lsaLookupSids3 and lsaLookupNames4 over tcpip */ if (p->binding->transport == NCACN_IP_TCP) { - if (!test_OpenPolicy(b, tctx, true)) { + if (!test_OpenPolicy_fail(b, tctx)) { ret = false; } @@ -3220,7 +3277,7 @@ bool torture_rpc_lsa(struct torture_context *tctx) return ret; } - if (!test_OpenPolicy(b, tctx, false)) { + if (!test_OpenPolicy(b, tctx)) { ret = false; } @@ -3317,7 +3374,7 @@ static bool testcase_LookupNames(struct torture_context *tctx, return true; } - if (!test_OpenPolicy(b, tctx, false)) { + if (!test_OpenPolicy(b, tctx)) { ret = false; } @@ -3410,7 +3467,7 @@ static bool testcase_TrustedDomains(struct torture_context *tctx, torture_comment(tctx, "Testing %d domains\n", state->num_trusts); - if (!test_OpenPolicy(b, tctx, false)) { + if (!test_OpenPolicy(b, tctx)) { ret = false; } @@ -3476,7 +3533,7 @@ static bool testcase_Privileges(struct torture_context *tctx, return true; } - if (!test_OpenPolicy(b, tctx, false)) { + if (!test_OpenPolicy(b, tctx)) { ret = false; } |