summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Tridgell <tridge@samba.org>2010-11-04 20:02:16 +1100
committerAndrew Tridgell <tridge@samba.org>2010-11-04 20:35:44 +1100
commitcf37c29cd009f9378ffa4d3ee54b38aef9fa066b (patch)
treeb62d8d7f70c1881e8e06afc42b703f6fcd1ed387
parentf3ad867ab57bfedada5e11cfaa15707f6a455d63 (diff)
downloadsamba-cf37c29cd009f9378ffa4d3ee54b38aef9fa066b.tar.gz
samba-cf37c29cd009f9378ffa4d3ee54b38aef9fa066b.tar.bz2
samba-cf37c29cd009f9378ffa4d3ee54b38aef9fa066b.zip
Move the checking of single valued attributes back into the tdb backend.
The backend is the only place that can do this properly. It makes no sense to do it anywhere else. As a result of it moving out of the backend we ended up with some bugs causing multiple values in single valued attributes (eg. isDeleted), which can really damage the inregrity of the database. For the override of single valued values needed for deleted linked attributes we should use attribute flags. This reverts commit 1949864417f3d10fb8996df7db259649eb777271.
-rw-r--r--source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/objectclass_attrs.c12
-rw-r--r--source4/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_tdb.c44
2 files changed, 44 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/objectclass_attrs.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/objectclass_attrs.c
index 62bc9ae8b2..ed193491d1 100644
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/objectclass_attrs.c
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/objectclass_attrs.c
@@ -296,18 +296,6 @@ static int attr_handler2(struct oc_context *ac)
return ldb_operr(ldb);
}
- /* Check if they're single-valued if this is requested */
- if ((msg->elements[i].num_values > 1) && (attr->isSingleValued)) {
- ldb_asprintf_errstring(ldb, "objectclass_attrs: attribute '%s' on entry '%s' is single-valued!",
- msg->elements[i].name,
- ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg->dn));
- if (ac->req->operation == LDB_ADD) {
- return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION;
- } else {
- return LDB_ERR_ATTRIBUTE_OR_VALUE_EXISTS;
- }
- }
-
/* We can use "str_list_check" with "strcmp" here since the
* attribute informations from the schema are always equal
* up-down-cased. */
diff --git a/source4/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_tdb.c b/source4/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_tdb.c
index d9547c98c4..b7432ab4d2 100644
--- a/source4/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_tdb.c
+++ b/source4/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_tdb.c
@@ -294,12 +294,20 @@ static int ltdb_add_internal(struct ldb_module *module,
for (i=0;i<msg->num_elements;i++) {
struct ldb_message_element *el = &msg->elements[i];
+ const struct ldb_schema_attribute *a = ldb_schema_attribute_by_name(ldb, el->name);
if (el->num_values == 0) {
ldb_asprintf_errstring(ldb, "attribute '%s' on '%s' specified, but with 0 values (illegal)",
el->name, ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg->dn));
return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION;
}
+ if (a && a->flags & LDB_ATTR_FLAG_SINGLE_VALUE) {
+ if (el->num_values > 1) {
+ ldb_asprintf_errstring(ldb, "SINGLE-VALUE attribute %s on %s specified more than once",
+ el->name, ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg->dn));
+ return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION;
+ }
+ }
}
ret = ltdb_store(module, msg, TDB_INSERT);
@@ -650,6 +658,7 @@ int ltdb_modify_internal(struct ldb_module *module,
for (i=0; i<msg->num_elements; i++) {
struct ldb_message_element *el = &msg->elements[i], *el2;
struct ldb_val *vals;
+ const struct ldb_schema_attribute *a = ldb_schema_attribute_by_name(ldb, el->name);
const char *dn;
switch (msg->elements[i].flags & LDB_FLAG_MOD_MASK) {
@@ -686,6 +695,15 @@ int ltdb_modify_internal(struct ldb_module *module,
}
}
+ if (a && a->flags & LDB_ATTR_FLAG_SINGLE_VALUE) {
+ if (el->num_values > 1) {
+ ldb_asprintf_errstring(ldb, "SINGLE-VALUE attribute %s on %s specified more than once",
+ el->name, ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg2->dn));
+ ret = LDB_ERR_ATTRIBUTE_OR_VALUE_EXISTS;
+ goto done;
+ }
+ }
+
/* Checks if element already exists */
idx = find_element(msg2, el->name);
if (idx == -1) {
@@ -702,6 +720,15 @@ int ltdb_modify_internal(struct ldb_module *module,
j = (unsigned int) idx;
el2 = &(msg2->elements[j]);
+ /* We cannot add another value on a existing one
+ if the attribute is single-valued */
+ if (a && a->flags & LDB_ATTR_FLAG_SINGLE_VALUE) {
+ ldb_asprintf_errstring(ldb, "SINGLE-VALUE attribute %s on %s specified more than once",
+ el->name, ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg2->dn));
+ ret = LDB_ERR_ATTRIBUTE_OR_VALUE_EXISTS;
+ goto done;
+ }
+
/* Check that values don't exist yet on multi-
valued attributes or aren't provided twice */
for (j = 0; j < el->num_values; j++) {
@@ -761,6 +788,23 @@ int ltdb_modify_internal(struct ldb_module *module,
case LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE:
+ if (a && a->flags & LDB_ATTR_FLAG_SINGLE_VALUE) {
+ /* the RELAX control overrides this
+ check for replace. This is needed as
+ DRS replication can produce multiple
+ values here for a single valued
+ attribute when the values are deleted
+ links
+ */
+ if (el->num_values > 1 &&
+ (!req || !ldb_request_get_control(req, LDB_CONTROL_RELAX_OID))) {
+ ldb_asprintf_errstring(ldb, "SINGLE-VALUE attribute %s on %s specified more than once",
+ el->name, ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg2->dn));
+ ret = LDB_ERR_ATTRIBUTE_OR_VALUE_EXISTS;
+ goto done;
+ }
+ }
+
/* TODO: This is O(n^2) - replace with more efficient check */
for (j=0; j<el->num_values; j++) {
if (ldb_msg_find_val(el, &el->values[j]) != &el->values[j]) {