smbtorture: Test that delete requests are not special

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>

1 files changed, 78 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/source4/torture/raw/oplock.c b/source4/torture/raw/oplock.c
index 7eb88a4abe..bd43ef4751 100644
--- a/source4/torture/raw/oplock.c
+++ b/source4/torture/raw/oplock.c
@@ -867,6 +867,82 @@ done:
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static bool test_raw_oplock_exclusive8(struct torture_context *tctx,
+				       struct smbcli_state *cli1,
+				       struct smbcli_state *cli2)
+{
+	const char *fname = BASEDIR "\\test_exclusive8.dat";
+	NTSTATUS status;
+	bool ret = true;
+	union smb_open io;
+	uint16_t fnum1 = 0;
+	uint16_t fnum2 = 0;
+	uint16_t fnum3 = 0;
+
+	if (!torture_setup_dir(cli1, BASEDIR)) {
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	/* cleanup */
+	smbcli_unlink(cli1->tree, fname);
+
+	smbcli_oplock_handler(cli1->transport, oplock_handler_ack_to_given,
+			      cli1->tree);
+
+	/*
+	  base ntcreatex parms
+	*/
+	io.generic.level = RAW_OPEN_NTCREATEX;
+	io.ntcreatex.in.root_fid.fnum = 0;
+	io.ntcreatex.in.access_mask = SEC_RIGHTS_FILE_ALL;
+	io.ntcreatex.in.alloc_size = 0;
+	io.ntcreatex.in.file_attr = FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL;
+	io.ntcreatex.in.share_access = NTCREATEX_SHARE_ACCESS_READ |
+		NTCREATEX_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE | NTCREATEX_SHARE_ACCESS_DELETE;
+	io.ntcreatex.in.open_disposition = NTCREATEX_DISP_OPEN_IF;
+	io.ntcreatex.in.create_options = 0;
+	io.ntcreatex.in.impersonation = NTCREATEX_IMPERSONATION_ANONYMOUS;
+	io.ntcreatex.in.security_flags = 0;
+	io.ntcreatex.in.fname = fname;
+
+	torture_comment(tctx, "open a file with an exclusive oplock (share "
+			"mode: all)\n");
+	ZERO_STRUCT(break_info);
+	io.ntcreatex.in.flags = NTCREATEX_FLAGS_EXTENDED |
+		NTCREATEX_FLAGS_REQUEST_OPLOCK;
+	status = smb_raw_open(cli1->tree, tctx, &io);
+	CHECK_STATUS(tctx, status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+	fnum1 = io.ntcreatex.out.file.fnum;
+	CHECK_VAL(io.ntcreatex.out.oplock_level, EXCLUSIVE_OPLOCK_RETURN);
+
+	torture_comment(tctx, "second open with delete should trigger a "
+			"break\n");
+
+	io.ntcreatex.in.access_mask = SEC_STD_DELETE;
+	io.ntcreatex.in.flags = 0;
+	status = smb_raw_open(cli2->tree, tctx, &io);
+	CHECK_STATUS(tctx, status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+	fnum2 = io.ntcreatex.out.file.fnum;
+	CHECK_VAL(break_info.count, get_break_level1_to_none_count(tctx));
+	CHECK_VAL(break_info.failures, 0);
+	CHECK_VAL(break_info.level, OPLOCK_BREAK_TO_LEVEL_II);
+
+	/* Trigger a little panic in "old" samba code.. */
+	status = smb_raw_open(cli2->tree, tctx, &io);
+	CHECK_STATUS(tctx, status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+	fnum3 = io.ntcreatex.out.file.fnum;
+
+	smbcli_close(cli2->tree, fnum3);
+	smbcli_close(cli2->tree, fnum2);
+	smbcli_close(cli1->tree, fnum1);
+
+done:
+	smbcli_deltree(cli1->tree, BASEDIR);
+	smb_raw_exit(cli1->session);
+	smb_raw_exit(cli2->session);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static bool test_raw_oplock_batch1(struct torture_context *tctx, struct smbcli_state *cli1, struct smbcli_state *cli2)
 {
 	const char *fname = BASEDIR "\\test_batch1.dat";
@@ -3956,6 +4032,8 @@ struct torture_suite *torture_raw_oplock(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx)
 	torture_suite_add_2smb_test(suite, "exclusive5", test_raw_oplock_exclusive5);
 	torture_suite_add_2smb_test(suite, "exclusive6", test_raw_oplock_exclusive6);
 	torture_suite_add_2smb_test(suite, "exclusive7", test_raw_oplock_exclusive7);
+	torture_suite_add_2smb_test(suite, "exclusive8",
+				    test_raw_oplock_exclusive8);
 	torture_suite_add_2smb_test(suite, "batch1", test_raw_oplock_batch1);
 	torture_suite_add_2smb_test(suite, "batch2", test_raw_oplock_batch2);
 	torture_suite_add_2smb_test(suite, "batch3", test_raw_oplock_batch3);