summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source4/torture/rpc/handles.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGünther Deschner <gd@samba.org>2010-03-19 15:35:36 +0100
committerStefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>2010-03-29 15:35:50 +0200
commite531b52ab965b7f258b475da9639330e3c49c8cc (patch)
treeb563c231f70adf817267aa2893fe9df8697c5cbd /source4/torture/rpc/handles.c
parent3398636a3bf2e55adda01eb92fc7aaf5c03adb2a (diff)
downloadsamba-e531b52ab965b7f258b475da9639330e3c49c8cc.tar.gz
samba-e531b52ab965b7f258b475da9639330e3c49c8cc.tar.bz2
samba-e531b52ab965b7f258b475da9639330e3c49c8cc.zip
s4:torture/rpc/handles.c: add explicit check for NTSTATUS r.out.result
Guenther Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'source4/torture/rpc/handles.c')
-rw-r--r--source4/torture/rpc/handles.c100
1 files changed, 61 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/source4/torture/rpc/handles.c b/source4/torture/rpc/handles.c
index ee41ce67dd..4e78e0a001 100644
--- a/source4/torture/rpc/handles.c
+++ b/source4/torture/rpc/handles.c
@@ -70,8 +70,9 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa(struct torture_context *torture)
r.in.access_mask = SEC_FLAG_MAXIMUM_ALLOWED;
r.out.handle = &handle;
- status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r);
- if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) {
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r),
+ "OpenPolicy failed");
+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(r.out.result)) {
torture_comment(torture, "lsa_OpenPolicy not supported - skipping\n");
talloc_free(mem_ctx);
return true;
@@ -86,8 +87,9 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa(struct torture_context *torture)
torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p2->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH,
"closing policy handle on p2");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c);
- torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "closing policy handle on p1");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c),
+ "Close failed");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, c.out.result, "closing policy handle on p1");
status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT,
@@ -158,8 +160,9 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
r.out.handle = &handle;
torture_comment(torture, "open lsa policy handle\n");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r);
- if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) {
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r),
+ "OpenPolicy failed");
+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(r.out.result)) {
torture_comment(torture, "lsa_OpenPolicy not supported - skipping\n");
talloc_free(mem_ctx);
return true;
@@ -185,27 +188,32 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
* use policy handle on all 3 connections
*/
torture_comment(torture, "use the policy handle on p1,p2,p3\n");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b1, mem_ctx, &qsec);
- torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b1, mem_ctx, &qsec),
+ "QuerySecurity failed");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, qsec.out.result, NT_STATUS_OK,
"use policy handle on p1");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b2, mem_ctx, &qsec);
- torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b2, mem_ctx, &qsec),
+ "QuerySecurity failed");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, qsec.out.result, NT_STATUS_OK,
"use policy handle on p2");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b3, mem_ctx, &qsec);
- torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b3, mem_ctx, &qsec),
+ "QuerySecurity failed");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, qsec.out.result, NT_STATUS_OK,
"use policy handle on p3");
/*
* close policy handle on connection 2 and the others get a fault
*/
torture_comment(torture, "close the policy handle on p2 others get a fault\n");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c);
- torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c),
+ "Close failed");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, c.out.result, NT_STATUS_OK,
"closing policy handle on p2");
status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c);
+
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT,
"closing policy handle on p1 again");
torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p1->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH,
@@ -227,23 +235,27 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
* open a new policy handle on p3
*/
torture_comment(torture, "open a new policy handle on p3\n");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b3, mem_ctx, &r);
- torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b3, mem_ctx, &r),
+ "OpenPolicy failed");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, r.out.result, NT_STATUS_OK,
"open policy handle on p3");
/*
* use policy handle on all 3 connections
*/
torture_comment(torture, "use the policy handle on p1,p2,p3\n");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b1, mem_ctx, &qsec);
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b1, mem_ctx, &qsec),
+ "Query Security failed");
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
"use policy handle on p1");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b2, mem_ctx, &qsec);
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b2, mem_ctx, &qsec),
+ "Query Security failed");
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
"use policy handle on p2");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b3, mem_ctx, &qsec);
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b3, mem_ctx, &qsec),
+ "Query Security failed");
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
"use policy handle on p3");
@@ -251,8 +263,9 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
* close policy handle on connection 2 and the others get a fault
*/
torture_comment(torture, "close the policy handle on p2 others get a fault\n");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c);
- torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c),
+ "Close failed");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, c.out.result, NT_STATUS_OK,
"closing policy handle on p2");
status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c);
@@ -277,12 +290,14 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
* open a new policy handle
*/
torture_comment(torture, "open a new policy handle on p1 and use it\n");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r);
- torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r),
+ "OpenPolicy failed");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, r.out.result, NT_STATUS_OK,
"open 2nd policy handle on p1");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b1, mem_ctx, &qsec);
- torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b1, mem_ctx, &qsec),
+ "QuerySecurity failed");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, qsec.out.result, NT_STATUS_OK,
"QuerySecurity handle on p1");
/* close first connection */
@@ -294,12 +309,14 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
* and it's still available on p2,p3
*/
torture_comment(torture, "use policy handle on p2,p3\n");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b2, mem_ctx, &qsec);
- torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b2, mem_ctx, &qsec),
+ "QuerySecurity failed");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, qsec.out.result, NT_STATUS_OK,
"QuerySecurity handle on p2 after p1 was disconnected");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b3, mem_ctx, &qsec);
- torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b3, mem_ctx, &qsec),
+ "QuerySecurity failed");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, qsec.out.result, NT_STATUS_OK,
"QuerySecurity handle on p3 after p1 was disconnected");
/*
@@ -313,8 +330,9 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening lsa pipe4");
b4 = p4->binding_handle;
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b4, mem_ctx, &qsec);
- torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b4, mem_ctx, &qsec),
+ "QuerySecurity failed");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, qsec.out.result, NT_STATUS_OK,
"using policy handle on p4");
/*
@@ -368,8 +386,9 @@ static bool test_handles_samr(struct torture_context *torture)
r.in.access_mask = SEC_FLAG_MAXIMUM_ALLOWED;
r.out.connect_handle = &handle;
- status = dcerpc_samr_Connect_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r);
- torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening policy handle on p1");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_samr_Connect_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r),
+ "Connect failed");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, r.out.result, "opening policy handle on p1");
c.in.handle = &handle;
c.out.handle = &handle2;
@@ -380,8 +399,9 @@ static bool test_handles_samr(struct torture_context *torture)
torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p2->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH,
"closing policy handle on p2");
- status = dcerpc_samr_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c);
- torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "closing policy handle on p1");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_samr_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c),
+ "Close failed");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, c.out.result, "closing policy handle on p1");
status = dcerpc_samr_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT,
@@ -434,8 +454,9 @@ static bool test_handles_mixed_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
r.out.connect_handle = &handle;
torture_comment(torture, "samr_Connect to open a policy handle on samr p1\n");
- status = dcerpc_samr_Connect_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r);
- torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening policy handle on p1");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_samr_Connect_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r),
+ "Connect failed");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, r.out.result, "opening policy handle on p1");
lc.in.handle = &handle;
lc.out.handle = &handle2;
@@ -450,8 +471,9 @@ static bool test_handles_mixed_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
"closing handle on lsa p2");
torture_comment(torture, "closing policy handle on samr p1\n");
- status = dcerpc_samr_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &sc);
- torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "closing policy handle on p1");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, dcerpc_samr_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &sc),
+ "Close failed");
+ torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, sc.out.result, "closing policy handle on p1");
talloc_free(p1);
talloc_free(p2);