summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source4/wrepl_server/wrepl_in_call.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSimo Sorce <idra@samba.org>2005-11-08 00:11:45 +0000
committerGerald (Jerry) Carter <jerry@samba.org>2007-10-10 13:45:53 -0500
commit5c9590587197dcb95007fdc54318187d5716c7c6 (patch)
treed5161aa628d8a4bc4f11bf849d76a451ff44522c /source4/wrepl_server/wrepl_in_call.c
parent14b59bcbec1a288810efee5c9442dff30f1a474a (diff)
downloadsamba-5c9590587197dcb95007fdc54318187d5716c7c6.tar.gz
samba-5c9590587197dcb95007fdc54318187d5716c7c6.tar.bz2
samba-5c9590587197dcb95007fdc54318187d5716c7c6.zip
r11567: Ldb API change patch.
This patch changes the way lsb_search is called and the meaning of the returned integer. The last argument of ldb_search is changed from struct ldb_message to struct ldb_result which contains a pointer to a struct ldb_message list and a count of the number of messages. The return is not the count of messages anymore but instead it is an ldb error value. I tryed to keep the patch as tiny as possible bu as you can guess I had to change a good amount of places. I also tried to double check all my changes being sure that the calling functions would still behave as before. But this patch is big enough that I fear some bug may have been introduced anyway even if it passes the test suite. So if you are currently working on any file being touched please give it a deep look and blame me for any error. Simo. (This used to be commit 22c8c97e6fb466b41859e090e959d7f1134be780)
Diffstat (limited to 'source4/wrepl_server/wrepl_in_call.c')
-rw-r--r--source4/wrepl_server/wrepl_in_call.c21
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/source4/wrepl_server/wrepl_in_call.c b/source4/wrepl_server/wrepl_in_call.c
index 7ccb52cc20..38d0b72405 100644
--- a/source4/wrepl_server/wrepl_in_call.c
+++ b/source4/wrepl_server/wrepl_in_call.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
#include "libcli/composite/composite.h"
#include "nbt_server/wins/winsdb.h"
#include "lib/ldb/include/ldb.h"
+#include "lib/ldb/include/ldb_errors.h"
static NTSTATUS wreplsrv_in_start_association(struct wreplsrv_in_call *call)
{
@@ -185,7 +186,7 @@ static NTSTATUS wreplsrv_in_send_request(struct wreplsrv_in_call *call)
struct wreplsrv_owner local_owner;
struct wreplsrv_owner *owner;
const char *filter;
- struct ldb_message **res = NULL;
+ struct ldb_result *res = NULL;
int ret;
struct wrepl_wins_name *names;
struct winsdb_record *rec;
@@ -240,28 +241,26 @@ static NTSTATUS wreplsrv_in_send_request(struct wreplsrv_in_call *call)
owner_in->min_version, owner_in->max_version);
NT_STATUS_HAVE_NO_MEMORY(filter);
ret = ldb_search(service->wins_db, NULL, LDB_SCOPE_SUBTREE, filter, NULL, &res);
- if (res != NULL) {
- talloc_steal(call, res);
- }
- if (ret < 0) return NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION;
- if (ret == 0) {
+ if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) return NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION;
+ talloc_steal(call, res);
+ if (res->count == 0) {
DEBUG(2,("WINSREPL:reply [%u] records owner[%s] min[%llu] max[%llu] to partner[%s]\n",
- ret, owner_in->address, owner_in->min_version, owner_in->max_version,
+ res->count, owner_in->address, owner_in->min_version, owner_in->max_version,
call->wreplconn->partner->address));
return NT_STATUS_OK;
}
- names = talloc_array(call, struct wrepl_wins_name, ret);
+ names = talloc_array(call, struct wrepl_wins_name, res->count);
NT_STATUS_HAVE_NO_MEMORY(names);
- for (i=0; i < ret; i++) {
- status = winsdb_record(res[i], NULL, call, &rec);
+ for (i = 0; i < res->count; i++) {
+ status = winsdb_record(res->msgs[i], NULL, call, &rec);
NT_STATUS_NOT_OK_RETURN(status);
status = wreplsrv_record2wins_name(names, call->wreplconn->our_ip, &names[i], rec);
NT_STATUS_NOT_OK_RETURN(status);
talloc_free(rec);
- talloc_free(res[i]);
+ talloc_free(res->msgs[i]);
}
/* sort the names before we send them */