diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c index 58a408a3d9..a2fe2a85db 100644 --- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c +++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ * Once this is done (which could update anything at all), we * calculate the password hashes. * - * This function must not only update the ntPwdHash, lmPwdHash and + * This function must not only update the unicodePwd, dBCSPwd and * krb5Key fields, it must also atomicly increment the * msDS-KeyVersionNumber. We should be in a transaction, so all this * should be quite safe... @@ -625,11 +625,11 @@ static int password_hash_add(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req) } if (ntAttr && (ntAttr->num_values > 1)) { - ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, "mupltiple values for lmPwdHash not allowed!\n"); + ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, "mupltiple values for unicodePwd not allowed!\n"); return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION; } if (lmAttr && (lmAttr->num_values > 1)) { - ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, "mupltiple values for lmPwdHash not allowed!\n"); + ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, "mupltiple values for dBCSPwd not allowed!\n"); return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION; } @@ -639,11 +639,11 @@ static int password_hash_add(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req) } if (ntAttr && (ntAttr->num_values == 0)) { - ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, "lmPwdHash must have a value!\n"); + ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, "unicodePwd must have a value!\n"); return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION; } if (lmAttr && (lmAttr->num_values == 0)) { - ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, "lmPwdHash must have a value!\n"); + ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, "dBCSPwd must have a value!\n"); return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION; } @@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ static int password_hash_add_do_add(struct ldb_handle *h) { } } - /* add also krb5 keys based on NT the hash (we might have ntPwdHash, but not the cleartext */ + /* add also krb5 keys based on NT the hash (we might have unicodePwd, but not the cleartext */ ret = add_krb5_keys_from_NThash(ac->module, msg, smb_krb5_context); if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { return ret; @@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ static int password_hash_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *r return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION; } - /* If no part of this touches the sambaPassword OR ntPwdHash and/or lmPwdHash, then we don't + /* If no part of this touches the sambaPassword OR unicodePwd and/or dBCSPwd, then we don't * need to make any changes. For password changes/set there should * be a 'delete' or a 'modify' on this attribute. */ /* If the only operation is the deletion of the passwords then go on */ |