summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/util/byteorder.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/util/byteorder.h')
-rw-r--r--lib/util/byteorder.h231
1 files changed, 231 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/util/byteorder.h b/lib/util/byteorder.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..894beccabf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/util/byteorder.h
@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
+/*
+ Unix SMB/CIFS implementation.
+ SMB Byte handling
+ Copyright (C) Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998
+
+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+ (at your option) any later version.
+
+ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+*/
+
+#ifndef _BYTEORDER_H
+#define _BYTEORDER_H
+
+/*
+ This file implements macros for machine independent short and
+ int manipulation
+
+Here is a description of this file that I emailed to the samba list once:
+
+> I am confused about the way that byteorder.h works in Samba. I have
+> looked at it, and I would have thought that you might make a distinction
+> between LE and BE machines, but you only seem to distinguish between 386
+> and all other architectures.
+>
+> Can you give me a clue?
+
+sure.
+
+The distinction between 386 and other architectures is only there as
+an optimisation. You can take it out completely and it will make no
+difference. The routines (macros) in byteorder.h are totally byteorder
+independent. The 386 optimsation just takes advantage of the fact that
+the x86 processors don't care about alignment, so we don't have to
+align ints on int boundaries etc. If there are other processors out
+there that aren't alignment sensitive then you could also define
+CAREFUL_ALIGNMENT=0 on those processors as well.
+
+Ok, now to the macros themselves. I'll take a simple example, say we
+want to extract a 2 byte integer from a SMB packet and put it into a
+type called uint16_t that is in the local machines byte order, and you
+want to do it with only the assumption that uint16_t is _at_least_ 16
+bits long (this last condition is very important for architectures
+that don't have any int types that are 2 bytes long)
+
+You do this:
+
+#define CVAL(buf,pos) (((uint8_t *)(buf))[pos])
+#define PVAL(buf,pos) ((uint_t)CVAL(buf,pos))
+#define SVAL(buf,pos) (PVAL(buf,pos)|PVAL(buf,(pos)+1)<<8)
+
+then to extract a uint16_t value at offset 25 in a buffer you do this:
+
+char *buffer = foo_bar();
+uint16_t xx = SVAL(buffer,25);
+
+We are using the byteoder independence of the ANSI C bitshifts to do
+the work. A good optimising compiler should turn this into efficient
+code, especially if it happens to have the right byteorder :-)
+
+I know these macros can be made a bit tidier by removing some of the
+casts, but you need to look at byteorder.h as a whole to see the
+reasoning behind them. byteorder.h defines the following macros:
+
+SVAL(buf,pos) - extract a 2 byte SMB value
+IVAL(buf,pos) - extract a 4 byte SMB value
+BVAL(buf,pos) - extract a 8 byte SMB value
+SVALS(buf,pos) - signed version of SVAL()
+IVALS(buf,pos) - signed version of IVAL()
+BVALS(buf,pos) - signed version of BVAL()
+
+SSVAL(buf,pos,val) - put a 2 byte SMB value into a buffer
+SIVAL(buf,pos,val) - put a 4 byte SMB value into a buffer
+SBVAL(buf,pos,val) - put a 8 byte SMB value into a buffer
+SSVALS(buf,pos,val) - signed version of SSVAL()
+SIVALS(buf,pos,val) - signed version of SIVAL()
+SBVALS(buf,pos,val) - signed version of SBVAL()
+
+RSVAL(buf,pos) - like SVAL() but for NMB byte ordering
+RSVALS(buf,pos) - like SVALS() but for NMB byte ordering
+RIVAL(buf,pos) - like IVAL() but for NMB byte ordering
+RIVALS(buf,pos) - like IVALS() but for NMB byte ordering
+RSSVAL(buf,pos,val) - like SSVAL() but for NMB ordering
+RSIVAL(buf,pos,val) - like SIVAL() but for NMB ordering
+RSIVALS(buf,pos,val) - like SIVALS() but for NMB ordering
+
+it also defines lots of intermediate macros, just ignore those :-)
+
+*/
+
+
+/*
+ on powerpc we can use the magic instructions to load/store
+ in little endian
+*/
+#if (defined(__powerpc__) && defined(__GNUC__))
+static __inline__ uint16_t ld_le16(const uint16_t *addr)
+{
+ uint16_t val;
+ __asm__ ("lhbrx %0,0,%1" : "=r" (val) : "r" (addr), "m" (*addr));
+ return val;
+}
+
+static __inline__ void st_le16(uint16_t *addr, const uint16_t val)
+{
+ __asm__ ("sthbrx %1,0,%2" : "=m" (*addr) : "r" (val), "r" (addr));
+}
+
+static __inline__ uint32_t ld_le32(const uint32_t *addr)
+{
+ uint32_t val;
+ __asm__ ("lwbrx %0,0,%1" : "=r" (val) : "r" (addr), "m" (*addr));
+ return val;
+}
+
+static __inline__ void st_le32(uint32_t *addr, const uint32_t val)
+{
+ __asm__ ("stwbrx %1,0,%2" : "=m" (*addr) : "r" (val), "r" (addr));
+}
+#define HAVE_ASM_BYTEORDER 1
+#else
+#define HAVE_ASM_BYTEORDER 0
+#endif
+
+
+
+#undef CAREFUL_ALIGNMENT
+
+/* we know that the 386 can handle misalignment and has the "right"
+ byteorder */
+#if defined(__i386__)
+#define CAREFUL_ALIGNMENT 0
+#endif
+
+#ifndef CAREFUL_ALIGNMENT
+#define CAREFUL_ALIGNMENT 1
+#endif
+
+#define CVAL(buf,pos) ((uint_t)(((const uint8_t *)(buf))[pos]))
+#define CVAL_NC(buf,pos) (((uint8_t *)(buf))[pos]) /* Non-const version of CVAL */
+#define PVAL(buf,pos) (CVAL(buf,pos))
+#define SCVAL(buf,pos,val) (CVAL_NC(buf,pos) = (val))
+
+#if HAVE_ASM_BYTEORDER
+
+#define _PTRPOS(buf,pos) (((const uint8_t *)buf)+(pos))
+#define SVAL(buf,pos) ld_le16((const uint16_t *)_PTRPOS(buf,pos))
+#define IVAL(buf,pos) ld_le32((const uint32_t *)_PTRPOS(buf,pos))
+#define SSVAL(buf,pos,val) st_le16((uint16_t *)_PTRPOS(buf,pos), val)
+#define SIVAL(buf,pos,val) st_le32((uint32_t *)_PTRPOS(buf,pos), val)
+#define SVALS(buf,pos) ((int16_t)SVAL(buf,pos))
+#define IVALS(buf,pos) ((int32_t)IVAL(buf,pos))
+#define SSVALS(buf,pos,val) SSVAL((buf),(pos),((int16_t)(val)))
+#define SIVALS(buf,pos,val) SIVAL((buf),(pos),((int32_t)(val)))
+
+#elif CAREFUL_ALIGNMENT
+
+#define SVAL(buf,pos) (PVAL(buf,pos)|PVAL(buf,(pos)+1)<<8)
+#define IVAL(buf,pos) (SVAL(buf,pos)|SVAL(buf,(pos)+2)<<16)
+#define SSVALX(buf,pos,val) (CVAL_NC(buf,pos)=(uint8_t)((val)&0xFF),CVAL_NC(buf,pos+1)=(uint8_t)((val)>>8))
+#define SIVALX(buf,pos,val) (SSVALX(buf,pos,val&0xFFFF),SSVALX(buf,pos+2,val>>16))
+#define SVALS(buf,pos) ((int16_t)SVAL(buf,pos))
+#define IVALS(buf,pos) ((int32_t)IVAL(buf,pos))
+#define SSVAL(buf,pos,val) SSVALX((buf),(pos),((uint16_t)(val)))
+#define SIVAL(buf,pos,val) SIVALX((buf),(pos),((uint32_t)(val)))
+#define SSVALS(buf,pos,val) SSVALX((buf),(pos),((int16_t)(val)))
+#define SIVALS(buf,pos,val) SIVALX((buf),(pos),((int32_t)(val)))
+
+#else /* not CAREFUL_ALIGNMENT */
+
+/* this handles things for architectures like the 386 that can handle
+ alignment errors */
+/*
+ WARNING: This section is dependent on the length of int16_t and int32_t
+ being correct
+*/
+
+/* get single value from an SMB buffer */
+#define SVAL(buf,pos) (*(const uint16_t *)((const char *)(buf) + (pos)))
+#define SVAL_NC(buf,pos) (*(uint16_t *)((char *)(buf) + (pos))) /* Non const version of above. */
+#define IVAL(buf,pos) (*(const uint32_t *)((const char *)(buf) + (pos)))
+#define IVAL_NC(buf,pos) (*(uint32_t *)((char *)(buf) + (pos))) /* Non const version of above. */
+#define SVALS(buf,pos) (*(const int16_t *)((const char *)(buf) + (pos)))
+#define SVALS_NC(buf,pos) (*(int16_t *)((char *)(buf) + (pos))) /* Non const version of above. */
+#define IVALS(buf,pos) (*(const int32_t *)((const char *)(buf) + (pos)))
+#define IVALS_NC(buf,pos) (*(int32_t *)((char *)(buf) + (pos))) /* Non const version of above. */
+
+/* store single value in an SMB buffer */
+#define SSVAL(buf,pos,val) SVAL_NC(buf,pos)=((uint16_t)(val))
+#define SIVAL(buf,pos,val) IVAL_NC(buf,pos)=((uint32_t)(val))
+#define SSVALS(buf,pos,val) SVALS_NC(buf,pos)=((int16_t)(val))
+#define SIVALS(buf,pos,val) IVALS_NC(buf,pos)=((int32_t)(val))
+
+#endif /* not CAREFUL_ALIGNMENT */
+
+/* now the reverse routines - these are used in nmb packets (mostly) */
+#define SREV(x) ((((x)&0xFF)<<8) | (((x)>>8)&0xFF))
+#define IREV(x) ((SREV(x)<<16) | (SREV((x)>>16)))
+
+#define RSVAL(buf,pos) SREV(SVAL(buf,pos))
+#define RSVALS(buf,pos) SREV(SVALS(buf,pos))
+#define RIVAL(buf,pos) IREV(IVAL(buf,pos))
+#define RIVALS(buf,pos) IREV(IVALS(buf,pos))
+#define RSSVAL(buf,pos,val) SSVAL(buf,pos,SREV(val))
+#define RSSVALS(buf,pos,val) SSVALS(buf,pos,SREV(val))
+#define RSIVAL(buf,pos,val) SIVAL(buf,pos,IREV(val))
+#define RSIVALS(buf,pos,val) SIVALS(buf,pos,IREV(val))
+
+/* Alignment macros. */
+#define ALIGN4(p,base) ((p) + ((4 - (PTR_DIFF((p), (base)) & 3)) & 3))
+#define ALIGN2(p,base) ((p) + ((2 - (PTR_DIFF((p), (base)) & 1)) & 1))
+
+
+/* macros for accessing SMB protocol elements */
+#define VWV(vwv) ((vwv)*2)
+
+/* 64 bit macros */
+#define BVAL(p, ofs) (IVAL(p,ofs) | (((uint64_t)IVAL(p,(ofs)+4)) << 32))
+#define BVALS(p, ofs) ((int64_t)BVAL(p,ofs))
+#define SBVAL(p, ofs, v) (SIVAL(p,ofs,(v)&0xFFFFFFFF), SIVAL(p,(ofs)+4,((uint64_t)(v))>>32))
+#define SBVALS(p, ofs, v) (SBVAL(p,ofs,(uint64_t)v))
+
+#endif /* _BYTEORDER_H */