| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
We found a few months ago that TDB_CLEAR_IF_FIRST is extremely
inefficient for large numbers of connections, due to a fundamental
limitation in the way posix byte range locking is implemented. Rather
than the nasty workaround we had for Samba3, we now have a single
"cleanup tmp files" function that runs when smbd starts. That deletes
the tmp tdbs, so TDB_CLEAR_IF_FIRST is not needed at all.
(This used to be commit ffa285bc783c775a2d53a58fb691ca339e6c76ae)
|
|
wakeup all pending locks at once. This change means that we only
trigger this anti-stampede code for write locks, as for pending read
locks the correct behaviour is to stampede (as they will all succeed)
(This used to be commit 8021d1d74207db1204139309592b9d2f80f2bd0e)
|
|
(This used to be commit cc93813e4a09c538ad485dc2b3cb4c9be34f3d18)
|
|
correctness). pvfs now passes the BASE-RENAME test.
(This used to be commit 4cf3f65a5c19fdad62a0bdef225b2d9002cf8c8b)
|
|
now pass BASE-UNLINK.
(This used to be commit f23a2f8538bda8f6790e86c93ee22436388b2975)
|
|
(This used to be commit f8041feaebc9170763ce04d2dd90cfc1c7889c21)
|
|
share_access support). This is enough for us to pass the BASE-DENY2
test, but is a long way from fully correct share modes.
(This used to be commit b5a6dd3cbf28a3a3b3a3656042ac8f50fca29e1c)
|
|
pvfs_open, and handle the various race conditions that are inherent in
cifs on unix, so we do the best we can when the race happens.
the ntcreatex code is really starting to take shape now
(This used to be commit 395c3815b468ae55de9a1135e478711f0e7d8cfc)
|
|
(This used to be commit f9dfd5ff1fcfd21fee9b08993b5fe6a6fae7f9d5)
|
|
anything yet, but will soon be the core of the shares modes code.
(This used to be commit ad1edabf95c6c331aac4f0caa7d31193e26bc176)
|
|
want to expose the brl context structure outside the brlock.c
code. Instead, I now use "struct brl_context *" and rely on C being
happy to pass around pointers to unknown structures as long as they
are not dereferenced. I will be interested to see how the build farm
likes this.
(This used to be commit cb155c8ad837285c5a7f5b104968239df0b65fd2)
|
|
- converted the tid handling to use a idtree instead of bitmaps
(This used to be commit 4220914179d10132057216650b65ed7f7679717e)
|
|
an extremely efficient way of mapping from an integer handle (such as
an open file handle) to a pointer (such as the structure containing
the open file information). The code is taken from lib/idr.c in the
2.6 Linux kernel, and is very fast and space efficient. By using
talloc it even has auto cleanup.
This commit converts the handling of open file handles and open
directory search handles to use the idtree routines. In combination
with talloc destructors, this simplifies the structure handling in the
pvfs backend a lot. For example, we no longer need to keep a linked
list of open directory searches at all, and we no longer need to do
linear scans of the list of open files on most operations.
The end result is that the pvfs code is now extremely scalable. You
can have 10s of thousands of open files and open searches and the code
still runs very fast.
I have also added a small optimisation into the file close path, to
avoid looking in the byte range locking database if we know that there
are no locks outstanding.
(This used to be commit 16835a0ef91a16fa01145b773aad8d43da215dbf)
|
|
an early lock timeout
added support for more of the bizarre special lock offset semantics of w2k3
(This used to be commit d5bfc910b1200fb283e26572dc57fcf93652fd32)
|
|
This adds a pvfs_wait_message() routine which uses the new messaging
system, event timers and talloc destructors to give a nice generic
async event handling system with a easy to use interface. The
extensions to pvfs_lock.c are based on calls to pvfs_wait_message()
routines.
We now pass all of our smbtorture locking tests, although while
writing this code I have thought of some additonal tests that should
be added, particularly for lock cancel operations. I'll work on that
soon.
This commit also extends the smbtorture lock tests to test the rather
weird 0xEEFFFFFF locking semantics that I have discovered in
win2003. Win2003 treats the 0xEEFFFFFF boundary as special, and will
give different error codes on either side of it. Locks on both sides
are allowed, the only difference is which error code is given when a
lock is denied. Anyone like to hazard a guess as to why? It has
me stumped.
(This used to be commit 4395c0557ab175d6a8dd99df03c266325949ffa5)
|
|
enough for us to pass locktest, but does not yet support lock timeouts
and some of the other esoteric features.
(This used to be commit 58a92abd88f190bc60894a68e0528e95ae33fe39)
|
